Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Melanie Subramanian, Benjamin D. Kozower, Lisa M. Brown, Onkar V. Khullar, Felix G. Fernandez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations


Background: Current studies in cardiothoracic clinical research frequently fail to use end points that are most meaningful to patients, including measures associated with quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent an underused but important component of high-quality patient-centered care. Our objective was to highlight important principles of PRO measurement, describe current use in cardiothoracic operations, and discuss the potential for and challenges associated with integration of PROs into large clinical databases. Methods: We performed a literature review by using the PubMed/EMBASE databases. Clinical articles that focused on the use of PROs in cardiothoracic surgical outcomes measurement or clinical research were included in this review. Results: PROs measure the outcomes that matter most to patients and facilitate the delivery of patient-centered care. When effectively used, PRO measures have provided detailed and nuanced quality-of-life data for comparative effectiveness research. However, further steps are needed to better integrate PROs into routine clinical care. Conclusions: Incorporation of PROs into routine clinical practice is essential for delivering high-quality patient-centered care. Future integration of PROs into prospectively collected registries and databases, including that The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database, has the potential to enrich comparative effectiveness research in cardiothoracic surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-301
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this