TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation
AU - Ristvedt, Stephen L.
AU - McFarland, Elizabeth G.
AU - Weinstock, Leonard B.
AU - Thyssen, Eric P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant N01 CN25516 to Elizabeth G. McFarland, M.D., and as a subcontract of the National Cancer Institute Prostate-Lung-Colon-Ovary Screening Trial (N01-CN-25516). We appreciate the support by Gerald Andriole, M.D., who is the Principal Investigator of the PLCO at Washington University School of Medicine. We acknowledge the help provided by the CT technologists at Barnes Jewish hospital of Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. We also greatly appreciate the thorough efforts of our dedicated study coordinator, Robin Haverman.
PY - 2003/3/1
Y1 - 2003/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine patient pre-examination expectations and postexamination appraisals for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy and bowel preparation. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 120 patients at defined risk for colorectal neoplasia was performed with CT colonography followed by colonoscopy on the same day. Subjects were stratified by age and sex (67 women and 53 men) and were randomized to receive either manual air (n = 61) or CO2 (n = 59) insufflation during CT colonography. Patients' expectations were assessed just before the two examinations, and appraisals were assessed 2 to 3 days afterward regarding pain/discomfort, embarrassment, difficulty, overall assessment, preference for future testing, and bowel preparation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in appraisals of manual air versus CO2 insufflation techniques. For both CT colonography and colonoscopy, patients' appraisals after the procedure were significantly more positive than prior expectations. Patients expressed more favorable appraisals of colonoscopy for pain (p < 0.001) and embarrassment (p < 0.001), with most responses being "none" to "a little" for both examinations. Overall appraisals of the tests were favorable and similar between CT and colonoscopy: patients mainly expressed "not unpleasant" to "a little unpleasant" (95%, 114/120 for both examinations). Overall, appraisal of the bowel preparation was the most negative. Preferences for future testing were more favorable toward CT: of the patients, 58% (69/120) preferred CT, 14% (17/120) preferred colonoscopy, and 28% (34/120) had no preference. CONCLUSIONS: Overall appraisals were similar and positive for both CT colonography and colonoscopy, with less favorable appraisals of the bowel preparation. Most patients stated that they would prefer CT for future evaluation.
AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine patient pre-examination expectations and postexamination appraisals for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy and bowel preparation. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 120 patients at defined risk for colorectal neoplasia was performed with CT colonography followed by colonoscopy on the same day. Subjects were stratified by age and sex (67 women and 53 men) and were randomized to receive either manual air (n = 61) or CO2 (n = 59) insufflation during CT colonography. Patients' expectations were assessed just before the two examinations, and appraisals were assessed 2 to 3 days afterward regarding pain/discomfort, embarrassment, difficulty, overall assessment, preference for future testing, and bowel preparation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in appraisals of manual air versus CO2 insufflation techniques. For both CT colonography and colonoscopy, patients' appraisals after the procedure were significantly more positive than prior expectations. Patients expressed more favorable appraisals of colonoscopy for pain (p < 0.001) and embarrassment (p < 0.001), with most responses being "none" to "a little" for both examinations. Overall appraisals of the tests were favorable and similar between CT and colonoscopy: patients mainly expressed "not unpleasant" to "a little unpleasant" (95%, 114/120 for both examinations). Overall, appraisal of the bowel preparation was the most negative. Preferences for future testing were more favorable toward CT: of the patients, 58% (69/120) preferred CT, 14% (17/120) preferred colonoscopy, and 28% (34/120) had no preference. CONCLUSIONS: Overall appraisals were similar and positive for both CT colonography and colonoscopy, with less favorable appraisals of the bowel preparation. Most patients stated that they would prefer CT for future evaluation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037347020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07302.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07302.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 12650790
AN - SCOPUS:0037347020
SN - 0002-9270
VL - 98
SP - 578
EP - 585
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 3
ER -