TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research
T2 - IMMPACT recommended considerations
AU - Haroutounian, Simon
AU - Holzer, Katherine J.
AU - Kerns, Robert D.
AU - Veasley, Christin
AU - Dworkin, Robert H.
AU - Turk, Dennis C.
AU - Carman, Kristin L.
AU - Chambers, Christine T.
AU - Cowan, Penney
AU - Edwards, Robert R.
AU - Eisenach, James C.
AU - Farrar, John T.
AU - Ferguson, McKenzie
AU - Forsythe, Laura P.
AU - Freeman, Roy
AU - Gewandter, Jennifer S.
AU - Gilron, Ian
AU - Goertz, Christine
AU - Grol-Prokopczyk, Hanna
AU - Iyengar, Smriti
AU - Jordan, Isabel
AU - Kamp, Cornelia
AU - Kleykamp, Bethea A.
AU - Knowles, Rachel L.
AU - Langford, Dale J.
AU - Mackey, Sean
AU - Malamut, Richard
AU - Markman, John
AU - Martin, Kathryn R.
AU - McNicol, Ewan
AU - Patel, Kushang V.
AU - Rice, Andrew S.C.
AU - Rowbotham, Michael
AU - Sandbrink, Friedhelm
AU - Simon, Lee S.
AU - Steiner, Deborah J.
AU - Vollert, Jan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - In the traditional clinical research model, patients are typically involved only as participants. However, there has been a shift in recent years highlighting the value and contributions that patients bring as members of the research team, across the clinical research lifecycle. It is becoming increasingly evident that to develop research that is both meaningful to people who have the targeted condition and is feasible, there are important benefits of involving patients in the planning, conduct, and dissemination of research from its earliest stages. In fact, research funders and regulatory agencies are now explicitly encouraging, and sometimes requiring, that patients are engaged as partners in research. Although this approach has become commonplace in some fields of clinical research, it remains the exception in clinical pain research. As such, the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials convened a meeting with patient partners and international representatives from academia, patient advocacy groups, government regulatory agencies, research funding organizations, academic journals, and the biopharmaceutical industry to develop consensus recommendations for advancing patient engagement in all stages of clinical pain research in an effective and purposeful manner. This article summarizes the results of this meeting and offers considerations for meaningful and authentic engagement of patient partners in clinical pain research, including recommendations for representation, timing, continuous engagement, measurement, reporting, and research dissemination.
AB - In the traditional clinical research model, patients are typically involved only as participants. However, there has been a shift in recent years highlighting the value and contributions that patients bring as members of the research team, across the clinical research lifecycle. It is becoming increasingly evident that to develop research that is both meaningful to people who have the targeted condition and is feasible, there are important benefits of involving patients in the planning, conduct, and dissemination of research from its earliest stages. In fact, research funders and regulatory agencies are now explicitly encouraging, and sometimes requiring, that patients are engaged as partners in research. Although this approach has become commonplace in some fields of clinical research, it remains the exception in clinical pain research. As such, the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials convened a meeting with patient partners and international representatives from academia, patient advocacy groups, government regulatory agencies, research funding organizations, academic journals, and the biopharmaceutical industry to develop consensus recommendations for advancing patient engagement in all stages of clinical pain research in an effective and purposeful manner. This article summarizes the results of this meeting and offers considerations for meaningful and authentic engagement of patient partners in clinical pain research, including recommendations for representation, timing, continuous engagement, measurement, reporting, and research dissemination.
KW - Clinical trials
KW - Pain
KW - Patient engagement
KW - Patient partners
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190753408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003121
DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003121
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38198239
AN - SCOPUS:85190753408
SN - 0304-3959
VL - 165
SP - 1013
EP - 1028
JO - Pain
JF - Pain
IS - 5
ER -