TY - JOUR
T1 - Past Roadblocks and New Opportunities in Transcription Factor Network Mapping
AU - Brent, Michael R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Thanks to Yiming Kang for help in preparation of Table 1 and to Barak Cohen for a useful discussion about enhancers. I am grateful to Gary Stormo for useful discussions of methods for determining TF binding specificity. M.R.B. was supported in part by grants GM100452 and AI087794 from National Institute of Allergy and Infections Disease and the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - One of the principal mechanisms by which cells differentiate and respond to changes in external signals or conditions is by changing the activity levels of transcription factors (TFs). This changes the transcription rates of target genes via the cell's TF network, which ultimately contributes to reconfiguring cellular state. Since microarrays provided our first window into global cellular state, computational biologists have eagerly attacked the problem of mapping TF networks, a key part of the cell's control circuitry. In retrospect, however, steady-state mRNA abundance levels were a poor substitute for TF activity levels and gene transcription rates. Likewise, mapping TF binding through chromatin immunoprecipitation proved less predictive of functional regulation and less amenable to systematic elucidation of complete networks than originally hoped. This review explains these roadblocks and the current, unprecedented blossoming of new experimental techniques built on second-generation sequencing, which hold out the promise of rapid progress in TF network mapping.
AB - One of the principal mechanisms by which cells differentiate and respond to changes in external signals or conditions is by changing the activity levels of transcription factors (TFs). This changes the transcription rates of target genes via the cell's TF network, which ultimately contributes to reconfiguring cellular state. Since microarrays provided our first window into global cellular state, computational biologists have eagerly attacked the problem of mapping TF networks, a key part of the cell's control circuitry. In retrospect, however, steady-state mRNA abundance levels were a poor substitute for TF activity levels and gene transcription rates. Likewise, mapping TF binding through chromatin immunoprecipitation proved less predictive of functional regulation and less amenable to systematic elucidation of complete networks than originally hoped. This review explains these roadblocks and the current, unprecedented blossoming of new experimental techniques built on second-generation sequencing, which hold out the promise of rapid progress in TF network mapping.
KW - computational methods
KW - gene expression profiling
KW - nascent RNA sequencing
KW - regulatory systems biology
KW - transcription factor activity
KW - transcriptional regulatory networks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992034201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tig.2016.08.009
DO - 10.1016/j.tig.2016.08.009
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27720190
AN - SCOPUS:84992034201
SN - 0168-9525
VL - 32
SP - 736
EP - 750
JO - Trends in Genetics
JF - Trends in Genetics
IS - 11
ER -