Paper #38: Cost analysis of a growth guidance system compared with magnetically controlled and traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective

Scott Luhmann; Eoin McAughey; Ackerman Stacey; David Bumpass; Richard McCarthy

doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.041

Paper #38: Cost analysis of a growth guidance system compared with magnetically controlled and traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective

Scott Luhmann, Eoin McAughey, Ackerman Stacey, David Bumpass, Richard McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Traditional growing rods (TGR), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and growth guidance systems (GGS) have demonstrated comparable radiographic outcomes in the treatment of early- onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to compare direct medical costs of GGS compared to TGR and MCGR using an economic model. Over a 6-year episode of care GGS had lower cumulative costs than MCGR and TGR, saving an estimated $25,226 vs TGR (16% decrease) and $29,916 vs MCGR (18% decrease).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	459-460
Number of pages	2
Journal	Spine deformity
Volume	5
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.041
State	Published - Nov 1 2017

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.041

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paper #38: Cost analysis of a growth guidance system compared with magnetically controlled and traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{0c69dd10ce154eb5a4798aa97f1a0725,

title = "Paper #38: Cost analysis of a growth guidance system compared with magnetically controlled and traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective",

abstract = "Traditional growing rods (TGR), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and growth guidance systems (GGS) have demonstrated comparable radiographic outcomes in the treatment of early- onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to compare direct medical costs of GGS compared to TGR and MCGR using an economic model. Over a 6-year episode of care GGS had lower cumulative costs than MCGR and TGR, saving an estimated $25,226 vs TGR (16% decrease) and $29,916 vs MCGR (18% decrease).",

author = "Scott Luhmann and Eoin McAughey and Ackerman Stacey and David Bumpass and Richard McCarthy",

year = "2017",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.041",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "459--460",

journal = "Spine deformity",

issn = "2212-134X",

number = "6",

}

Paper #38: Cost analysis of a growth guidance system compared with magnetically controlled and traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective. / Luhmann, Scott; McAughey, Eoin; Stacey, Ackerman et al.
In: Spine deformity, Vol. 5, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 459-460.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paper #38

T2 - Cost analysis of a growth guidance system compared with magnetically controlled and traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective

AU - Luhmann, Scott

AU - McAughey, Eoin

AU - Stacey, Ackerman

AU - Bumpass, David

AU - McCarthy, Richard

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Traditional growing rods (TGR), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and growth guidance systems (GGS) have demonstrated comparable radiographic outcomes in the treatment of early- onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to compare direct medical costs of GGS compared to TGR and MCGR using an economic model. Over a 6-year episode of care GGS had lower cumulative costs than MCGR and TGR, saving an estimated $25,226 vs TGR (16% decrease) and $29,916 vs MCGR (18% decrease).

AB - Traditional growing rods (TGR), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and growth guidance systems (GGS) have demonstrated comparable radiographic outcomes in the treatment of early- onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to compare direct medical costs of GGS compared to TGR and MCGR using an economic model. Over a 6-year episode of care GGS had lower cumulative costs than MCGR and TGR, saving an estimated $25,226 vs TGR (16% decrease) and $29,916 vs MCGR (18% decrease).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078689671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.041

DO - 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.041

M3 - Article

C2 - 31997172

AN - SCOPUS:85078689671

SN - 2212-134X

VL - 5

SP - 459

EP - 460

JO - Spine deformity

JF - Spine deformity

IS - 6

ER -

Paper #38: Cost analysis of a growth guidance system compared with magnetically controlled and traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this