Overcoming biases in m&a: A process perspective

  • Massimo Garbuio
  • , Dan Lovallo
  • , John Horn

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    11 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Mergers & acquisitions (M&A) are an important element of any company's growth plan. However, the actual performance of most M&A activity fails to live up to the expectations of the acquirers. The psychological biases that affect decision-making have been posited as a source of this disappointing performance. The broad strokes in which these biases have been offered up as explanation for M&A failure don't offer much insight into the specific causes, and therefore the actions business leaders can take to mitigate their impact. We review a 4-step M&A process, identify the different biases that affect the different stages, and then offer practical debiasing techniques targeted at that particular stage of the decision-making process. This targeted debiasing can help business leaders find practical solutions to this vexing problem. Finally, we review two biases that motivate decision makers to avoid pursuing M&A deals at all - to the detriment of achieving their growth targets.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAdvances in Mergers and Acquisitions
    EditorsCary Cooper, Sydney Finkelstein
    Pages83-104
    Number of pages22
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2010

    Publication series

    NameAdvances in Mergers and Acquisitions
    Volume9
    ISSN (Print)1479-361X

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Overcoming biases in m&a: A process perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this