TY - JOUR
T1 - Outpatient-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
AU - Dyk, Pawel T.
AU - Richardson, Susan
AU - Badiyan, Shahed N.
AU - Schwarz, Julie K.
AU - Esthappan, Jacqueline
AU - Garcia-Ramirez, Jose L.
AU - Grigsby, Perry W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Brachytherapy Society.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate outpatient-based high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Methods and Materials: Between December 2006 and July 2012, 50 patients were treated with twice-daily outpatient-based HDR iridium-192 ISBT at our institution. Thirty-two patients had vaginal cancers, 13 vulvar, 3 urethral, and 2 cervical cancers. The most common histologies were squamous cell carcinoma (58%) and endometrioid adenocarcinoma (26%). Twenty-six patients were treated with definitive radiation therapy with or without platinum-based chemotherapy, 16 were treated for recurrent disease, 5 were treated in the postoperative setting, and 3 were treated palliatively. Forty patients received external beam radiation therapy before ISBT. Results: Median followup was 13.7months. Median interstitial dose was 18Gy in 2.25Gy twice-daily fractions prescribed to the implant volume. Median external beam dose was 50.4Gy in 1.8Gy daily fractions prescribed to the primary disease site. Eight patients (16%) were seen in the emergency room or were admitted to the hospital during treatment. Six patients (17%) experienced significant complications after treatment (3 ulcerations at the primary site, 1 vaginal necrosis, 1 vaginal abscess, and 1 patient with urinary obstruction). Larger volume encompassing 100% of the prescribed dose was correlated with significant complications on multivariate analysis (. p=0.039). Actuarial local control at 1year was 72%, with univariate analysis demonstrating worse local control for nonendometrioid adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma (20% vs. 84%, p=0.044). Conclusions: Outpatient-based HDR ISBT is feasible and safe, with toxicity and local control rates consistent with historical outcomes.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate outpatient-based high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Methods and Materials: Between December 2006 and July 2012, 50 patients were treated with twice-daily outpatient-based HDR iridium-192 ISBT at our institution. Thirty-two patients had vaginal cancers, 13 vulvar, 3 urethral, and 2 cervical cancers. The most common histologies were squamous cell carcinoma (58%) and endometrioid adenocarcinoma (26%). Twenty-six patients were treated with definitive radiation therapy with or without platinum-based chemotherapy, 16 were treated for recurrent disease, 5 were treated in the postoperative setting, and 3 were treated palliatively. Forty patients received external beam radiation therapy before ISBT. Results: Median followup was 13.7months. Median interstitial dose was 18Gy in 2.25Gy twice-daily fractions prescribed to the implant volume. Median external beam dose was 50.4Gy in 1.8Gy daily fractions prescribed to the primary disease site. Eight patients (16%) were seen in the emergency room or were admitted to the hospital during treatment. Six patients (17%) experienced significant complications after treatment (3 ulcerations at the primary site, 1 vaginal necrosis, 1 vaginal abscess, and 1 patient with urinary obstruction). Larger volume encompassing 100% of the prescribed dose was correlated with significant complications on multivariate analysis (. p=0.039). Actuarial local control at 1year was 72%, with univariate analysis demonstrating worse local control for nonendometrioid adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma (20% vs. 84%, p=0.044). Conclusions: Outpatient-based HDR ISBT is feasible and safe, with toxicity and local control rates consistent with historical outcomes.
KW - HDR
KW - ISBT
KW - Interstitial brachytherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923919279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.11.017
DO - 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.11.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 25556865
AN - SCOPUS:84923919279
SN - 1538-4721
VL - 14
SP - 231
EP - 237
JO - Brachytherapy
JF - Brachytherapy
IS - 2
ER -