TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of Patients With Extramedullary Disease in Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma From the Pooled LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies
AU - Moreau, Philippe
AU - Mateos, María Victoria
AU - Goldschmidt, Hartmut
AU - Garcia, Maria Esther Gonzalez
AU - Besemer, Britta
AU - Perez, Marta Sonia Gonzalez
AU - Mohty, Mohamad
AU - Lindsey-Hill, Joanne
AU - Kirkpatrick, Suriya
AU - Delforge, Michel
AU - Angelucci, Emanuele
AU - Raimondo, Francesco Di
AU - Vij, Ravi
AU - Doyle, Margaret
AU - Gray, Kathleen
AU - Albrecht, Claire
AU - Strulev, Vadim
AU - Haddad, Imène
AU - Koskinen, Silva
AU - Acciarri, Lorenzo
AU - Buyze, Jozefien
AU - Weisel, Katja
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who develop extramedullary disease (EMD) generally have a poor prognosis, highlighting the urgent need for new therapies. We report effectiveness outcomes and safety in patients with and without EMD from the pooled analysis of LocoMMotion and MoMMent. Methods: LocoMMotion and MoMMent-1 are prospective, noninterventional, consecutive studies assessing the evolving standard of care from 20192022 in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM. Results: Of 302 patients, 29 had EMD per investigator discretion and only 15 patients were assessed as having true extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP; defined as patients with ≥1 EMP lesion) by the response review committee. The 29 EMD patients received 21 unique regimens (most commonly chemotherapy-based regimens). Of the 29 patients with EMD, overall response rate (ORR) was 24.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.66 months, median overall survival (OS) was 7.16 months, and median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 3.09 months. All responses were lower (ORR) and shorter (median PFS, OS, and TTNT) in patients with EMD vs patients without EMD. Nineteen (65.5%) patients with EMD received ≥1 subsequent lines of therapy. Of those, two (10.5%) patients received bispecific antibodies and achieved a partial response or better; three (15.8%) patients received antibody-drug conjugates (responses were unknown or not determined at data cut-off), and no patients received chimeric antigen receptorT cell therapy. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the urgent need for more effective novel therapies for patients with EMD and highlight the need to use clear definitions of EMD and EMD response criteria for clinical trials.
AB - Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who develop extramedullary disease (EMD) generally have a poor prognosis, highlighting the urgent need for new therapies. We report effectiveness outcomes and safety in patients with and without EMD from the pooled analysis of LocoMMotion and MoMMent. Methods: LocoMMotion and MoMMent-1 are prospective, noninterventional, consecutive studies assessing the evolving standard of care from 20192022 in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM. Results: Of 302 patients, 29 had EMD per investigator discretion and only 15 patients were assessed as having true extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP; defined as patients with ≥1 EMP lesion) by the response review committee. The 29 EMD patients received 21 unique regimens (most commonly chemotherapy-based regimens). Of the 29 patients with EMD, overall response rate (ORR) was 24.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.66 months, median overall survival (OS) was 7.16 months, and median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 3.09 months. All responses were lower (ORR) and shorter (median PFS, OS, and TTNT) in patients with EMD vs patients without EMD. Nineteen (65.5%) patients with EMD received ≥1 subsequent lines of therapy. Of those, two (10.5%) patients received bispecific antibodies and achieved a partial response or better; three (15.8%) patients received antibody-drug conjugates (responses were unknown or not determined at data cut-off), and no patients received chimeric antigen receptorT cell therapy. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the urgent need for more effective novel therapies for patients with EMD and highlight the need to use clear definitions of EMD and EMD response criteria for clinical trials.
KW - Extramedullary plasmacytoma
KW - Prospective
KW - Real-life outcomes
KW - Standard-of-care
KW - Treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003942547
U2 - 10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.014
DO - 10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 40307153
AN - SCOPUS:105003942547
SN - 2152-2650
VL - 25
SP - 646-655.e1
JO - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
JF - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
IS - 9
ER -