TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of a tailored self-care intervention for patients with heart failure and major depression
T2 - A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
AU - Freedland, Kenneth E.
AU - Skala, Judith A.
AU - Carney, Robert M.
AU - Steinmeyer, Brian C.
AU - Rich, Michael W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Background: Depression is a recognized barrier to heart failure self-care, but there has been little research on interventions to improve heart failure self-care in depressed patients. Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of an individually tailored self-care intervention for patients with heart failure and major depression, and to determine whether the adequacy of self-care at baseline, the severity of depression or anxiety, or other factors affect the outcomes of this intervention. Design: Secondary analysis of data from a pre-registered randomized controlled trial (NCT02997865). Methods: Outpatients with heart failure and comorbid major depression (n = 139) were randomly assigned to cognitive behavior therapy or usual care for depression. In addition, an experienced cardiac nurse provided the tailored self-care intervention to all patients in both arms of the trial starting eight weeks after randomization. Weekly self-care intervention sessions were held between Weeks 8 and 16; the frequency was tapered to biweekly or monthly between Weeks 17 and 32. The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (v6.2) was used to assess self-care outcomes, with scores ≥ 70 on each of its three scales (Maintenance, Management, and Confidence) being consistent with adequate self-care. The Week 16 Maintenance scale score was the primary outcome for this analysis. Results: At baseline, 107 (77%) of the patients scored in the inadequate self-care range on the Maintenance scale. Between Weeks 8 and 16, Maintenance scores improved more in patients with initially inadequate than initially adequate self-care (11.9 vs. 3.2 points, p =.003). Sixty-six (48%) of the patients with initially inadequate Maintenance scores achieved scores in the adequate range by Week 32 (p <.0001). Covariate-adjusted predictors of better Maintenance outcomes included adequate Maintenance at baseline (p <.0001), higher anxiety at baseline (p <.05), and higher dosages of the self-care intervention (p <.0001). Neither treatment with cognitive behavior therapy nor less severe major depression predicted better self-care outcomes. Conclusions: Depressed patients with inadequate heart failure self-care are able to achieve clinically significant improvements in self-care with the help of an individually tailored self-care intervention. Further refinement and testing are needed to increase the intervention's potential for clinical implementation.
AB - Background: Depression is a recognized barrier to heart failure self-care, but there has been little research on interventions to improve heart failure self-care in depressed patients. Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of an individually tailored self-care intervention for patients with heart failure and major depression, and to determine whether the adequacy of self-care at baseline, the severity of depression or anxiety, or other factors affect the outcomes of this intervention. Design: Secondary analysis of data from a pre-registered randomized controlled trial (NCT02997865). Methods: Outpatients with heart failure and comorbid major depression (n = 139) were randomly assigned to cognitive behavior therapy or usual care for depression. In addition, an experienced cardiac nurse provided the tailored self-care intervention to all patients in both arms of the trial starting eight weeks after randomization. Weekly self-care intervention sessions were held between Weeks 8 and 16; the frequency was tapered to biweekly or monthly between Weeks 17 and 32. The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (v6.2) was used to assess self-care outcomes, with scores ≥ 70 on each of its three scales (Maintenance, Management, and Confidence) being consistent with adequate self-care. The Week 16 Maintenance scale score was the primary outcome for this analysis. Results: At baseline, 107 (77%) of the patients scored in the inadequate self-care range on the Maintenance scale. Between Weeks 8 and 16, Maintenance scores improved more in patients with initially inadequate than initially adequate self-care (11.9 vs. 3.2 points, p =.003). Sixty-six (48%) of the patients with initially inadequate Maintenance scores achieved scores in the adequate range by Week 32 (p <.0001). Covariate-adjusted predictors of better Maintenance outcomes included adequate Maintenance at baseline (p <.0001), higher anxiety at baseline (p <.05), and higher dosages of the self-care intervention (p <.0001). Neither treatment with cognitive behavior therapy nor less severe major depression predicted better self-care outcomes. Conclusions: Depressed patients with inadequate heart failure self-care are able to achieve clinically significant improvements in self-care with the help of an individually tailored self-care intervention. Further refinement and testing are needed to increase the intervention's potential for clinical implementation.
KW - Anxiety
KW - Depression
KW - Depressive disorder
KW - Heart failure
KW - Randomized controlled trial
KW - Self-care
KW - Self-management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168470406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104585
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104585
M3 - Article
C2 - 37611354
AN - SCOPUS:85168470406
SN - 0020-7489
VL - 147
JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies
JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies
M1 - 104585
ER -