TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcome and utility of scoring systems in the management of the mangled extremity
AU - Durham, Rodney M.
AU - Mistry, Bhargav M.
AU - Mazuski, John E.
AU - Shapiro, Marc
AU - Jacobs, Donald
PY - 1996/11
Y1 - 1996/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: The role of scoring systems as predictors of amputation and functional outcome in severe blunt extremity trauma was examined. METHODS: All severe extremity injuries treated over a 10-year period were scored retrospectively using four scoring systems: Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index (MESI), Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Predictive Salvage Index (PSI), and Limb Salvage Index (LSI). RESULTS: Twenty-three upper (UE) and 51 lower extremity (LE) injuries were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were MESI 100% and 50%, MESS 79% and 83%, PSI 96% and 50%, and LSI 83% and 83%. For each system, there were no differences between patients with good and poor functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: All of the scoring systems were able to identify the majority of patients who required amputation. However, prediction in individual patients was problematic. None of the scoring systems were able to predict functional outcome.
AB - BACKGROUND: The role of scoring systems as predictors of amputation and functional outcome in severe blunt extremity trauma was examined. METHODS: All severe extremity injuries treated over a 10-year period were scored retrospectively using four scoring systems: Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index (MESI), Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Predictive Salvage Index (PSI), and Limb Salvage Index (LSI). RESULTS: Twenty-three upper (UE) and 51 lower extremity (LE) injuries were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were MESI 100% and 50%, MESS 79% and 83%, PSI 96% and 50%, and LSI 83% and 83%. For each system, there were no differences between patients with good and poor functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: All of the scoring systems were able to identify the majority of patients who required amputation. However, prediction in individual patients was problematic. None of the scoring systems were able to predict functional outcome.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030296523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00245-0
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00245-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 8942565
AN - SCOPUS:0030296523
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 172
SP - 569
EP - 574
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 5
ER -