Optimum investments in project evaluations: When are cost-effectiveness analyses cost-effective?

Robert S. Woodward, Stuart B. Boxerman, Mark A. Schnitzler, W. Claiborne Dunagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This manuscript extends the classical models of the value of information to ask whether a hospital's net financial return is ever maximized by a cost- effectiveness analysis of retrospective data when watchful waiting and a full randomized clinical trial are alternative methodologies. The manuscript demonstrates that (1) some small-scale retrospective analyses may negatively affect net income and (2) under some conditions, larger-scale retrospective analyses may maximize net income. The manuscript also suggests that risk aversion increases the value of information and therefore the optimum expenditure on a project evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-393
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Medical Systems
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1996

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • project evaluation
  • risk aversion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimum investments in project evaluations: When are cost-effectiveness analyses cost-effective?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this