Optimal Urine Culture Diagnostic Stewardship Practice-Results from an Expert Modified-Delphi Procedure

Kimberly C. Claeys, Barbara W. Trautner, Surbhi Leekha, K. C. Coffey, Christopher J. Crnich, Dan J. Diekema, Mohamad G. Fakih, Matthew Bidwell Goetz, Kalpana Gupta, Makoto M. Jones, Luci Leykum, Stephen Y. Liang, Lisa Pineles, Ashley Pleiss, Emily S. Spivak, Katie J. Suda, Jennifer M. Taylor, Chanu Rhee, Daniel J. Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND: Urine cultures are nonspecific and often lead to misdiagnosis of urinary tract infection and unnecessary antibiotics. Diagnostic stewardship is a set of procedures that modifies test ordering, processing, and reporting in order to optimize diagnosis and downstream treatment. In this study, we aimed to develop expert guidance on best practices for urine culture diagnostic stewardship. METHODS: A RAND-modified Delphi approach with a multidisciplinary expert panel was used to ascertain diagnostic stewardship best practices. Clinical questions to guide recommendations were grouped into three thematic areas (ordering, processing, reporting) in practice settings of emergency department, inpatient, ambulatory, and long-term care. Fifteen experts ranked recommendations on a 9-point Likert scale. Recommendations on which the panel did not reach agreement were discussed during a virtual meeting, then a second round of ranking by email was completed. After secondary review of results and panel discussion, a series of guidance statements was developed. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five questions were reviewed. The panel reaching agreement on 104, leading to 18 overarching guidance statements. The following strategies were recommended to optimize ordering urine cultures: requiring documentation of symptoms, sending alerts to discourage ordering in the absence of symptoms, and cancelling repeat cultures. For urine culture processing, conditional urine cultures and urine white blood cell count as criteria were supported. For urine culture reporting, appropriate practices included nudges to discourage treatment under specific conditions and selective reporting of antibiotics to guide therapy decisions. CONCLUSIONS: These 18 guidance statements can optimize use of urine cultures for better patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-389
Number of pages8
JournalClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 31 2022


  • diagnostic stewardship
  • expert consensus
  • modified Delphi
  • urinary tract infection
  • urine cultures


Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal Urine Culture Diagnostic Stewardship Practice-Results from an Expert Modified-Delphi Procedure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this