TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome
AU - Liu, Jingxia
AU - Liu, Lei
AU - Colditz, Graham A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri, for supporting this research (P30 CA91842). The work of Lei Liu was supported by Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grant UL1TR000448 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH. The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Funding Information:
We thank the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri, for supporting this research (P30 CA91842). The work of Lei Liu was supported by Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grant UL1TR000448 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH.
Funding Information:
Teerenstra et al discussed the Helping Hands trial (Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development ZonMw, grant number 80–007028–98-07101).25 This study aimed to change nurse behavior through two strategies and randomized the wards to either strategy. The two strategies included the state-of-the-art strategy, which is derived from literature regarding education, reminders, feedback, and targeting adequate products and facilities, and the extended strategy, which contains all elements of the state-of-the-art strategy plus activities aimed at influencing social influence in groups and enhancing leadership. The primary endpoint was adherence to hygiene guidelines (Yes vs. No), and multiple evaluations of nurses' guideline adherence were observed. The researchers expected to improve the adherence from 60% in the state-of-the-art strategy to 70% in the extended strategy. Teerenstra et al considered the constant behavior of nurse r = 0.6 and intraward coefficient correlation = 0.03.25 We calculated the total number of wards m = 58 to obtain 80% power using the number of nurses per ward n = 15 and the number of evaluations K = 3 under the same assumptions of (r, ) using Equation (4). We assume c = 2000, s = 50, and e = 10 in this study, then the total cost of 58 × (2000 + 50 × 15 + 10 × 3 × 15) = 185 600 will be needed.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2019/9/10
Y1 - 2019/9/10
N2 - Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) were originally proposed for use when randomization at the subject level is practically infeasible or may lead to a severe estimation bias of the treatment effect. However, recruiting an additional cluster costs more than enrolling an additional subject in an individually randomized trial. Under budget constraints, researchers have proposed the optimal sample sizes in two-level CRTs. CRTs may have a three-level structure, in which two levels of clustering should be considered. In this paper, we propose optimal designs in three-level CRTs with a binary outcome, assuming a nested exchangeable correlation structure in generalized estimating equation models. We provide the variance of estimators of three commonly used measures: risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio. For a given sampling budget, we discuss how many clusters and how many subjects per cluster are necessary to minimize the variance of each measure estimator. For known association parameters, the locally optimal design is proposed. When association parameters are unknown but within predetermined ranges, the MaxiMin design is proposed to maximize the minimum of relative efficiency over the possible ranges, that is, to minimize the risk of the worst scenario.
AB - Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) were originally proposed for use when randomization at the subject level is practically infeasible or may lead to a severe estimation bias of the treatment effect. However, recruiting an additional cluster costs more than enrolling an additional subject in an individually randomized trial. Under budget constraints, researchers have proposed the optimal sample sizes in two-level CRTs. CRTs may have a three-level structure, in which two levels of clustering should be considered. In this paper, we propose optimal designs in three-level CRTs with a binary outcome, assuming a nested exchangeable correlation structure in generalized estimating equation models. We provide the variance of estimators of three commonly used measures: risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio. For a given sampling budget, we discuss how many clusters and how many subjects per cluster are necessary to minimize the variance of each measure estimator. For known association parameters, the locally optimal design is proposed. When association parameters are unknown but within predetermined ranges, the MaxiMin design is proposed to maximize the minimum of relative efficiency over the possible ranges, that is, to minimize the risk of the worst scenario.
KW - cluster randomized trial (CRT)
KW - dissemination and implementation
KW - generalized estimating equation (GEE)
KW - intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC)
KW - nested correlation structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066989573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/sim.8153
DO - 10.1002/sim.8153
M3 - Article
C2 - 31162709
AN - SCOPUS:85066989573
SN - 0277-6715
VL - 38
SP - 3733
EP - 3746
JO - Statistics in medicine
JF - Statistics in medicine
IS - 20
ER -