Background: Radiomics analyses has been proposed to interrogate the biology of tumour as well as to predict/assess response to therapy in vivo. The objective of this work was to assess the sensitivity of radiomics features to noise, resolution, and tumour volume in the context of a co-clinical trial. Methods: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients were recruited into an ongoing co-clinical imaging trial. Sub-typed matched TNBC patient-derived tumour xenografts (PDX) were generated to investigate optimal co-clinical MR radiomic features. The MR imaging protocol included T1-weighed and T2-weighted imaging. To test the sensitivity of radiomics to resolution, PDX were imaged at three different resolutions. Multiple sets of images with varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were generated, and an image independent patch-based method was implemented to measure the noise levels. Forty-eight radiomic features were extracted from manually segmented 2D and 3D segmented tumours and normal tissues of T1- and T2- weighted co-clinical MR images. Findings: Sixteen radiomics features were identified as volume dependent and corrected for volume-dependency following normalization. Features from grey-level run-length matrix (GLRLM), grey-level size zone matrix (GLSZM) were identified as most sensitive to noise. Radiomic features Kurtosis and Run-length variance (RLV) from GLSZM were most sensitive to changes in resolution in both T1w and T2w MRI. In general, 3D radiomic features were more robust compared to 2D (single slice) measures, although the former exhibited higher variability between subjects. Interpretation: Tumour volume, noise characteristics, and image resolution significantly impact radiomic analysis in co-clinical studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102963
StatePublished - Sep 2020


  • Breast cancer
  • Co-clinical
  • MRI
  • Quantitative imaging
  • Radiomics
  • Sensitivity
  • TNBC


Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal co-clinical radiomics: Sensitivity of radiomic features to tumour volume, image noise and resolution in co-clinical T1-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this