TY - JOUR
T1 - Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1
T2 - The effect of presenting symptoms on outcome
AU - King, Allison
AU - Listernick, Robert
AU - Charrow, Joel
AU - Piersall, Linda
AU - Gutmann, David H.
PY - 2003/10/1
Y1 - 2003/10/1
N2 - Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) may present with optic pathway gliomas (OPG) that can progress to visual loss or other neurologic symptoms. These tumors may become evident either as a result of patient signs or symptoms or as an incidental finding on "baseline" neuroimaging studies. In an attempt to determine if there were differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic children with OPG, a retrospective cohort study of ninety children with NF1 and OPG was performed using data from two large NF1 referral centers. Age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, tumor location, associated features, and clinical response were assessed for children who were initially symptomatic from their OPG (n=51) and compared to similar data of asymptomatic children whose tumors were incidentally discovered by MRI (n = 39). There were no differences in age at presentation, tumor location, NF1-associated symptoms, or clinical response between the groups. Initially symptomatic children were much more likely to require treatment (OR: 14.8, 95% CI [1.9-116.7]) than those with incidentally discovered, asymptomatic OPG. Although 36% of OPG were diagnosed in children over the age of 6 years, none received prior neuroimaging and only two children had previously normal eye examinations, suggesting that the vast majority of OPG in this group were longstanding, undiagnosed tumors. Based on these findings, we do not advocate "baseline" MRI in children with NF1, but strongly recommend that all children of the age 10 years and younger with NF1 have complete annual ophthalmologic evaluations.
AB - Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) may present with optic pathway gliomas (OPG) that can progress to visual loss or other neurologic symptoms. These tumors may become evident either as a result of patient signs or symptoms or as an incidental finding on "baseline" neuroimaging studies. In an attempt to determine if there were differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic children with OPG, a retrospective cohort study of ninety children with NF1 and OPG was performed using data from two large NF1 referral centers. Age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, tumor location, associated features, and clinical response were assessed for children who were initially symptomatic from their OPG (n=51) and compared to similar data of asymptomatic children whose tumors were incidentally discovered by MRI (n = 39). There were no differences in age at presentation, tumor location, NF1-associated symptoms, or clinical response between the groups. Initially symptomatic children were much more likely to require treatment (OR: 14.8, 95% CI [1.9-116.7]) than those with incidentally discovered, asymptomatic OPG. Although 36% of OPG were diagnosed in children over the age of 6 years, none received prior neuroimaging and only two children had previously normal eye examinations, suggesting that the vast majority of OPG in this group were longstanding, undiagnosed tumors. Based on these findings, we do not advocate "baseline" MRI in children with NF1, but strongly recommend that all children of the age 10 years and younger with NF1 have complete annual ophthalmologic evaluations.
KW - Brain tumor
KW - Neurofibromatosis 1
KW - Optic pathway glioma
KW - Pilocytic astrocytoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141457247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajmg.a.20211
DO - 10.1002/ajmg.a.20211
M3 - Article
C2 - 12955759
AN - SCOPUS:0141457247
SN - 1552-4825
VL - 122 A
SP - 95
EP - 99
JO - American Journal of Medical Genetics
JF - American Journal of Medical Genetics
IS - 2
ER -