TY - JOUR
T1 - Opioid use and social disadvantage in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
AU - Cheng, Abby L.
AU - Brady, Brian K.
AU - Bradley, Ethan C.
AU - Calfee, Ryan P.
AU - Klesges, Lisa M.
AU - Colditz, Graham A.
AU - Prather, Heidi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge biostatisticians Amber Salter, PhD (Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine), and Lee Rhea, PhD (Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine), who assisted with statistical analysis and were compensated for their work. The authors also acknowledge Melissa Armbrecht, who assisted with manuscript preparation. This study was supported by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and Grant K23AR074520 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (Dr. Cheng). The funding bodies had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the report for publication. No other funding sources supported this study.
Funding Information:
Doris Duke Foundation, Grant/Award Number: Doris Duke Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists; National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Grant/Award Number: K23AR074520 Funding information
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: Historically, marginalized patients were prescribed less opioid medication than affluent, white patients. However, because of persistent differential access to nonopioid pain treatments, this direction of disparity in opioid prescribing may have reversed. Objective: To compare social disadvantage and health in patients with chronic pain who were managed with versus without chronic opioid therapy. It was hypothesized that patients routinely prescribed opioids would be more likely to live in socially disadvantaged communities and report worse health. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a retrospective cohort defined from medical records from 2000 to 2019. Setting: Single tertiary safety net medical center. Patients: Adult patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who were managed longitudinally by a physiatric group practice from at least 2011 to 2015 (n = 1173), subgrouped by chronic (≥4 years) adherent opioid usage (n = 356) versus no chronic opioid usage (n = 817). Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the unadjusted between-group difference in social disadvantage, defined by living in the worst national quartile of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). An adjusted effect size was also calculated using logistic regression, with age, sex, race, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Physical Function scores as covariates. Secondary outcomes included adjusted differences in health by chronic opioid use (measured by PROMIS). Results: Patients managed with chronic opioid therapy were more likely to live in a zip code within the most socially disadvantaged national quartile (34.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 29.9–39.9%; vs. 24.9%; 95% CI 21.9–28.0%; P <.001), and social disadvantage was independently associated with chronic opioid use (odds ratio [OR] 1.01 per ADI percentile [1.01–1.02]). Opioid use was also associated with meaningfully worse PROMIS Depression (3.8 points [2.4–5.1]), Anxiety (3.0 [1.4–4.5]), and Pain Interference (2.6 [1.7–3.5]) scores. Conclusions: Patients prescribed chronic opioid treatment were more likely to live in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods, and chronic opioid use was independently associated with worse behavioral health. Improving access to multidisciplinary, nonopioid treatments for chronic pain may be key to successfully overcoming the opioid crisis.
AB - Background: Historically, marginalized patients were prescribed less opioid medication than affluent, white patients. However, because of persistent differential access to nonopioid pain treatments, this direction of disparity in opioid prescribing may have reversed. Objective: To compare social disadvantage and health in patients with chronic pain who were managed with versus without chronic opioid therapy. It was hypothesized that patients routinely prescribed opioids would be more likely to live in socially disadvantaged communities and report worse health. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a retrospective cohort defined from medical records from 2000 to 2019. Setting: Single tertiary safety net medical center. Patients: Adult patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who were managed longitudinally by a physiatric group practice from at least 2011 to 2015 (n = 1173), subgrouped by chronic (≥4 years) adherent opioid usage (n = 356) versus no chronic opioid usage (n = 817). Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the unadjusted between-group difference in social disadvantage, defined by living in the worst national quartile of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). An adjusted effect size was also calculated using logistic regression, with age, sex, race, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Physical Function scores as covariates. Secondary outcomes included adjusted differences in health by chronic opioid use (measured by PROMIS). Results: Patients managed with chronic opioid therapy were more likely to live in a zip code within the most socially disadvantaged national quartile (34.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 29.9–39.9%; vs. 24.9%; 95% CI 21.9–28.0%; P <.001), and social disadvantage was independently associated with chronic opioid use (odds ratio [OR] 1.01 per ADI percentile [1.01–1.02]). Opioid use was also associated with meaningfully worse PROMIS Depression (3.8 points [2.4–5.1]), Anxiety (3.0 [1.4–4.5]), and Pain Interference (2.6 [1.7–3.5]) scores. Conclusions: Patients prescribed chronic opioid treatment were more likely to live in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods, and chronic opioid use was independently associated with worse behavioral health. Improving access to multidisciplinary, nonopioid treatments for chronic pain may be key to successfully overcoming the opioid crisis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104961588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pmrj.12596
DO - 10.1002/pmrj.12596
M3 - Article
C2 - 33773068
AN - SCOPUS:85104961588
SN - 1934-1482
VL - 14
SP - 309
EP - 319
JO - PM and R
JF - PM and R
IS - 3
ER -