Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: A comparative study

  • Timothy S. O'Brien
  • , Timothy S. Hart
  • , Michael J. Shereff
  • , James Stone
  • , Jeffrey Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

151 Scopus citations

Abstract

A retrospective review was undertaken for 36 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis. Nineteen patients underwent an arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, and 17 patients underwent an open arthrodesis. Only patients with limited angular deformities were suitable candidates for an arthroscopic arthrodesis. The open arthrodesis group inclusion criteria were defined by the maximum coronal and sagittal plane deformity in the arthroscopic group. Perioperative parameters were compared and analyzed. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis yielded comparable fusion rates to open ankle arthrodesis, with significantly less morbidity, shorter operative times, shorter tourniquet times, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is a valid alternative to traditional open arthrodesis of the ankle for selected patients with ankle arthritis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-374
Number of pages7
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: A comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this