Online Ratings for Vascular Interventional Proceduralists Vary by Physician Specialty

Zachary J. Wanken, John B. Rode, Sarah Y. Bessen, Peter B. Anderson, J. Aaron Barnes, Mark A. Eid, Philip P. Goodney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Background: Multiple specialties offer vascular interventional care, creating potential competition for referrals and procedures. At the same time, patient/consumer ratings have become more impactful for physicians who perform vascular procedures. We hypothesized that there are differences in online ratings based on specialty. Methods: We used official program lists from the Association for Graduate Medical Education to identify institutions with training programs in integrated vascular surgery (VS), integrated interventional radiology (IR), and interventional cardiology (IC). Faculty providers were identified in each specialty at these institutions. A standardized search was performed to collect online ratings from,, and as well as from online demographics. Between specialty differences were analyzed using chi-squared and analysis of variance tests as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with review volume and star rating. Results: A total of 1,330 providers (n = 454 VS, n = 451 IR, n = 425 IC) were identified across 47 institutions in 27 states. VS (55.5%–69.4%) and IC (63.8%–71.1%) providers were significantly more likely to have reviews than IR (28.6%–48.8%) providers across all online platforms (P < 0.001 for all websites). Across all platforms, IC providers were rated significantly higher than VS and IR providers. Multivariable regression showed that provider specialty and additional time in practice were associated with higher review volume. In addition to specialty, review volume was associated with star rating as those physicians with more reviews tended to have a higher rating. Conclusions: On average, vascular surgeons have more reviews and are more highly rated than interventional radiologists but tend to have fewer reviews and lower ratings than interventional cardiologists. VS providers may benefit from encouraging patients to file online reviews, especially in competitive markets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-35
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
StatePublished - Jan 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Online Ratings for Vascular Interventional Proceduralists Vary by Physician Specialty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this