Omniscience and Eternity: A reply to Craig

  • Jonathan L. Kvanvig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

William Craig presents an argument against those who maintain that there is no contradiction between being eternal and being omniscient. One of his targets is my own account of how an eternal God can be omniscient. Craig claims that my treatment of temporal indexicals such as 'now7 is inadequate, and that my theory gives no general account of tense. Craig's argument misunderstands the theory of indexicals I give, and I show how to extend the theory to give a general account of tense.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-376
Number of pages8
JournalFaith and Philosophy
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Omniscience and Eternity: A reply to Craig'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this