Nuclear medicine and resources for patients: How complex are online patient educational materials?

David R. Hansberry, Kush Shah, Nitin Agarwal, Sung M. Kim, Charles M. Intenzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Internet is a major source of health care information for patients. The American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommend that consumer health care websites be written at a third- to seventh-grade level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of readability of patient education websites pertaining to nuclear medicine. Methods: We searched for 10 terms on Google, collected the top 10 links for each term, and analyzed their level of readability using 10 well-established readability scales. Results: Collectively, the 99 articles were written at a grade level of 11.8 (SD, 3.4). Only 5 of the 99 articles were written at the third- to seventhgrade level recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association. Conclusion: There is a clear discordance between the readability level of nuclear medicine- related imaging terms and the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association guidelines. This discordance may have a negative impact on patient understanding, contributing to poor health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-146
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Keywords

  • Health literacy
  • Nuclear medicine
  • Patient education
  • Readability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nuclear medicine and resources for patients: How complex are online patient educational materials?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this