TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel patient-centered approach to facilitate same-day discharge in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention
AU - Amin, Amit P.
AU - Crimmins-Reda, Patricia
AU - Miller, Samantha
AU - Rahn, Brandon
AU - Caruso, Mary
AU - Pierce, Andrew
AU - Dennis, Brandy
AU - Pendegraft, Marissa
AU - Sorensen, Katrine
AU - Kurz, Howard I.
AU - Lasala, John M.
AU - Zajarias, Alan
AU - Bach, Richard G.
AU - Kulkarni, Hemant
AU - Singh, Jasvindar
N1 - Funding Information:
Amin is funded via an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R18 grant award (grant R18HS0224181-01A1) and also a comparative effectiveness research KM1 career development award from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (grants UL1TR000448, KL2TR000450, and TL1TR000449) and the National Cancer Institute (grant 1KM1CA156708-01), both of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors.
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - Background--Same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention is safe, less costly, and preferred by patients, but it is usually performed in low-risk patients, if at all. To increase the appropriate use of SDD in more complex patients, we implemented a "patient-centered" protocol based on risk of complications at Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Methods and Results--Our objectives were as follows: (1) to evaluate time trends in SDD; (2) to compare (a) mortality, bleeding, and acute kidney injury, (b) patient satisfaction, and (c) hospital costs by SDD versus no SDD (NSDD); and (3) to compare SDD eligibility by our patient-centered approach versus Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions guidelines. Our patient-centered approach was based on prospectively identifying personalized bleeding, mortality, and acute kidney injury risks, with a personalized safe contrast limit and mitigating those risks. We analyzed Barnes-Jewish Hospital's National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry data from July 1, 2009 to September 30, 2015 (N=1752). SDD increased rapidly from 0% to 77% (P < 0.001), independent of radial access. Although SDD patients were comparable to NSDD patients, SDD was not associated with adverse outcomes (0% mortality, 0% bleeds, and 0.4% acute kidney injury). Patient satisfaction was high with SDD. Propensity score-adjusted costs were $7331 lower/SDD patient (P < 0.001), saving an estimated $1.8 million annually. Only 16 patients (6.95%) met the eligibility for SDD by Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions guidelines, implying our patient-centered approach markedly increased SDD eligibility. Conclusions--With a patient-centered approach, SDD rapidly increased and was safe in 75% of patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, despite patient complexity. Patient satisfaction was high, and hospital costs were lower. Patient-centered decision making to facilitate SDD is an important opportunity to improve the value of percutaneous coronary intervention.
AB - Background--Same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention is safe, less costly, and preferred by patients, but it is usually performed in low-risk patients, if at all. To increase the appropriate use of SDD in more complex patients, we implemented a "patient-centered" protocol based on risk of complications at Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Methods and Results--Our objectives were as follows: (1) to evaluate time trends in SDD; (2) to compare (a) mortality, bleeding, and acute kidney injury, (b) patient satisfaction, and (c) hospital costs by SDD versus no SDD (NSDD); and (3) to compare SDD eligibility by our patient-centered approach versus Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions guidelines. Our patient-centered approach was based on prospectively identifying personalized bleeding, mortality, and acute kidney injury risks, with a personalized safe contrast limit and mitigating those risks. We analyzed Barnes-Jewish Hospital's National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry data from July 1, 2009 to September 30, 2015 (N=1752). SDD increased rapidly from 0% to 77% (P < 0.001), independent of radial access. Although SDD patients were comparable to NSDD patients, SDD was not associated with adverse outcomes (0% mortality, 0% bleeds, and 0.4% acute kidney injury). Patient satisfaction was high with SDD. Propensity score-adjusted costs were $7331 lower/SDD patient (P < 0.001), saving an estimated $1.8 million annually. Only 16 patients (6.95%) met the eligibility for SDD by Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions guidelines, implying our patient-centered approach markedly increased SDD eligibility. Conclusions--With a patient-centered approach, SDD rapidly increased and was safe in 75% of patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, despite patient complexity. Patient satisfaction was high, and hospital costs were lower. Patient-centered decision making to facilitate SDD is an important opportunity to improve the value of percutaneous coronary intervention.
KW - Elective percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Hospital costs
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Sameday discharge
KW - Transradial
KW - Transradial approach
KW - cost
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042142191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.117.005733
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.117.005733
M3 - Article
C2 - 29449273
AN - SCOPUS:85042142191
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 7
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 4
M1 - e005733
ER -