TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel CAC Dispersion and Density Score to Predict Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Mortality
AU - Huangfu, Gavin
AU - Ihdayhid, Abdul R.
AU - Kwok, Simon
AU - Konstantopoulos, John
AU - Niu, Kai
AU - Lu, Juan
AU - Smallbone, Harry
AU - Figtree, Gemma A.
AU - Chow, Clara K.
AU - Dembo, Lawrence
AU - Adler, Brendan
AU - Hamilton-Craig, Christian
AU - Grieve, Stuart M.
AU - Chan, Matthew T.V.
AU - Butler, Craig R.
AU - Tandon, Vikas
AU - Nagele, Peter
AU - Woodard, Pamela K.
AU - Mrkobrada, Marko
AU - Szczeklik, Wojciech
AU - Aziz, Yang Faridah Abdul
AU - Biccard, Bruce
AU - Devereaux, Philip James
AU - Sheth, Tej
AU - Dwivedi, Girish
AU - Chow, Benjamin J.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2025/8/1
Y1 - 2025/8/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) provides robust prediction for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but current techniques disregard plaque distribution and protective effects of high CAC density. We investigated whether a novel CAC-dispersion and density (CAC-DAD) score will exhibit superior prognostic value compared with the Agatston score (AS) for MACE prediction. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 961 patients (median age, 67 years; 61% men) who underwent cardiac computed tomography for cardiovascular or perioperative risk assessment. Blinded analyzers applied deep learning algorithms to noncontrast scans to calculate the CAC-DAD score, which adjusts for the spatial distribution of CAC and assigns a protective weight factor for lesions with ≥1000 Hounsfield units. Associations were assessed using frailty regression. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 30 (30-460) days, 61 patients experienced MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiovascular mortality). An elevated CAC-DAD score (≥2050 based on optimal cutoff) captured more MACE than AS ≥400 (74% versus 57%; P=0.002). Univariable analysis revealed that an elevated CAC-DAD score, AS ≥400 and AS ≥100, age, diabetes, hypertension, and statin use predicted MACE. On multivariable analysis, only the CAC-DAD score (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.43-4.61]; P=0.002), age, statins, and diabetes remained significant. The inclusion of the CAC-DAD score in a predictive model containing demographic factors and AS improved the C statistic from 0.61 to 0.66 (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated CAC-DAD score improves MACE prediction compared with the AS. Patients with a high CAC-DAD score, including those with a low AS, may be at higher risk and warrant intensification of their preventative therapies.
AB - BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) provides robust prediction for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but current techniques disregard plaque distribution and protective effects of high CAC density. We investigated whether a novel CAC-dispersion and density (CAC-DAD) score will exhibit superior prognostic value compared with the Agatston score (AS) for MACE prediction. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 961 patients (median age, 67 years; 61% men) who underwent cardiac computed tomography for cardiovascular or perioperative risk assessment. Blinded analyzers applied deep learning algorithms to noncontrast scans to calculate the CAC-DAD score, which adjusts for the spatial distribution of CAC and assigns a protective weight factor for lesions with ≥1000 Hounsfield units. Associations were assessed using frailty regression. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 30 (30-460) days, 61 patients experienced MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiovascular mortality). An elevated CAC-DAD score (≥2050 based on optimal cutoff) captured more MACE than AS ≥400 (74% versus 57%; P=0.002). Univariable analysis revealed that an elevated CAC-DAD score, AS ≥400 and AS ≥100, age, diabetes, hypertension, and statin use predicted MACE. On multivariable analysis, only the CAC-DAD score (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.43-4.61]; P=0.002), age, statins, and diabetes remained significant. The inclusion of the CAC-DAD score in a predictive model containing demographic factors and AS improved the C statistic from 0.61 to 0.66 (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated CAC-DAD score improves MACE prediction compared with the AS. Patients with a high CAC-DAD score, including those with a low AS, may be at higher risk and warrant intensification of their preventative therapies.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - cross-sectional studies
KW - follow-up studies
KW - prognosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010254750
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018059
DO - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018059
M3 - Article
C2 - 40613107
AN - SCOPUS:105010254750
SN - 1941-9651
VL - 18
SP - e018059
JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 8
ER -