Non-invasive detection of divergent metabolic signals in insulin deficiency vs. insulin resistance in vivo

Cornelius Von Morze, Prasanna K.R. Allu, Gene Y. Chang, Irene Marco-Rius, Eugene Milshteyn, Zhen J. Wang, Michael A. Ohliger, Catherine E. Gleason, John Kurhanewicz, Daniel B. Vigneron, David Pearce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The type 2 diabetic phenotype results from mixed effects of insulin deficiency and insulin resistance, but the relative contributions of these two distinct factors remain poorly characterized, as do the respective roles of the gluconeogenic organs. The purpose of this study was to investigate localized in vivo metabolic changes in liver and kidneys of contrasting models of diabetes mellitus (DM): streptozotocin (STZ)-treated wild-type Zucker rats (T1DM) and Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats (T2DM). Intermediary metabolism was probed using hyperpolarized (HP) [1-13C]pyruvate MRI of the liver and kidneys. These data were correlated with gene expression data for key mediators, assessed using rtPCR. Increased HP [1-13C]lactate was detected in both models, in association with elevated gluconeogenesis as reflected by increased expression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase. In contrast, HP [1-13C]alanine diverged between the two models, increasing in ZDF rats, while decreasing in the STZ-treated rats. The differences in liver alanine paralleled differences in key lipogenic mediators. Thus, HP [1-13C]alanine is a marker that can identify phenotypic differences in kidneys and liver of rats with T1DM vs. T2DM, non-invasively in vivo. This approach could provide a powerful diagnostic tool for characterizing tissue metabolic defects and responses to treatment in diabetic patients with ambiguous systemic manifestations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2088
JournalScientific reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-invasive detection of divergent metabolic signals in insulin deficiency vs. insulin resistance in vivo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this