No significant difference in thick versus thin osteochondral flap trochleoplasty in the treatment of trochlear dysplasia: A systematic review

Purpose: Trochleoplasty has become increasingly utilised to address patellar instability in the setting of severe trochlear dysplasia. There remains a paucity of literature on the outcomes of ‘thick’- versus ‘thin’-osteochondral flap trochleoplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients with patellar instability with symptomatic trochlear dysplasia treated using a ‘thick’ versus ‘thin’ osteochondral flap trochleoplasty. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using a PRISMA checklist. Quality assessment of final articles was conducted by two blinded reviewers. Articles were separated based on the use of a ‘thick’ versus ‘thin’ flap trochleoplasty. Data collection consisted of recording the following variables: patient demographics, indications for trochleoplasty, mean follow-up time, additional procedures performed during trochleoplasty, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic outcomes (tibial tubercle-trochlear groove [TT-TG] distance, Caton–Deschamps Index [CDI] and sulcus angle [SA]) and the incidence of any postoperative complications and patellar redislocation rates. Results: A total of 24 studies, consisting of 927 patients, were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. A total of five papers described a ‘thick’ flap technique, while 19 papers described the use of a ‘thin’ flap technique. No significant difference in the mean improvement of Kujala scores was appreciated when comparing ‘thick’ versus ‘thin’ techniques (p > 0.05). Improvements in mean radiographic outcomes based on TT-TG, CDI and SA were observed in both ‘thick’ and ‘thin’ flap trochleoplasty groups. The overall redislocation rate was 0.35%. Conclusion: No significant difference in Kujala scores was observed in patients undergoing trochleoplasty utilising ‘thick’ versus ‘thin’ technique, while improvements in mean TT-TG, CDI and SA were noted in both technique groups, with an overall redislocation rate of 0.35%. Level of Evidence: Level IV.