TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural manifolds for odor-driven innate and acquired appetitive preferences
AU - Chandak, Rishabh
AU - Raman, Baranidharan
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank members of the Raman Lab (Washington University in St. Louis) and Dr. Debajit Saha (Michigan State University) for their feedback on the manuscript. We thank Pearl Olsen for insect care. This research was supported by NSF (1453022, 1724218, 2021795) and ONR (N00014-19-1-2049, N00014-21-1-2343) grants to B.R.
Funding Information:
We thank members of the Raman Lab (Washington University in St. Louis) and Dr. Debajit Saha (Michigan State University) for their feedback on the manuscript. We thank Pearl Olsen for insect care. This research was supported by NSF (1453022, 1724218, 2021795) and ONR (N00014-19-1-2049, N00014-21-1-2343) grants to B.R.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Sensory stimuli evoke spiking neural responses that innately or after learning drive suitable behavioral outputs. How are these spiking activities intrinsically patterned to encode for innate preferences, and could the neural response organization impose constraints on learning? We examined this issue in the locust olfactory system. Using a diverse odor panel, we found that ensemble activities both during (‘ON response’) and after stimulus presentations (‘OFF response’) could be linearly mapped onto overall appetitive preference indices. Although diverse, ON and OFF response patterns generated by innately appetitive odorants (higher palp-opening responses) were still limited to a low-dimensional subspace (a ‘neural manifold’). Similarly, innately non-appetitive odorants evoked responses that were separable yet confined to another neural manifold. Notably, only odorants that evoked neural response excursions in the appetitive manifold could be associated with gustatory reward. In sum, these results provide insights into how encoding for innate preferences can also impact associative learning.
AB - Sensory stimuli evoke spiking neural responses that innately or after learning drive suitable behavioral outputs. How are these spiking activities intrinsically patterned to encode for innate preferences, and could the neural response organization impose constraints on learning? We examined this issue in the locust olfactory system. Using a diverse odor panel, we found that ensemble activities both during (‘ON response’) and after stimulus presentations (‘OFF response’) could be linearly mapped onto overall appetitive preference indices. Although diverse, ON and OFF response patterns generated by innately appetitive odorants (higher palp-opening responses) were still limited to a low-dimensional subspace (a ‘neural manifold’). Similarly, innately non-appetitive odorants evoked responses that were separable yet confined to another neural manifold. Notably, only odorants that evoked neural response excursions in the appetitive manifold could be associated with gustatory reward. In sum, these results provide insights into how encoding for innate preferences can also impact associative learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166598912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-023-40443-2
DO - 10.1038/s41467-023-40443-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 37543628
AN - SCOPUS:85166598912
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 14
JO - Nature communications
JF - Nature communications
IS - 1
M1 - 4719
ER -