Abstract
Introduction: Duration of training to reliably measure nerve cross-sectional area with ultrasound is unknown. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of ultrasound data, acquired and recorded by 2 examiners—an expert and either a trainee with 2 months (novice) or a trainee with 12 months (experienced) of experience. Data on median, ulnar, and radial nerves were reviewed for 42 patients. Results: Interrater reliability was good and varied most with nerve site but little with experience. Coefficient of variation (CoV) range was 9.33%–22.5%. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was good to excellent (0.65–95) except ulnar nerve-wrist/forearm and radial nerve-humerus (ICC = 0.39–0.59). Interrater differences did not vary with nerve size or body mass index. Expert–novice and expert–experienced interrater differences and CoV were similar. The ulnar nerve-wrist expert–novice interrater difference decreased with time (rs = −0.68, P = 0.001). Discussion: A trainee with at least 2 months of experience can reliably measure upper limb nerves. Reliability varies by nerve and location and slightly improves with time. Muscle Nerve 57: 189–192, 2018.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 189-192 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Muscle and Nerve |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2018 |
Keywords
- nerve
- reliability
- sonography
- training
- ultrasound
- upper limb
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nerve ultrasound reliability of upper limbs: Effects of examiner training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver