TY - JOUR
T1 - Neratinib + capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and ≥ 2 prior HER2-directed regimens
AU - Moy, Beverly
AU - Oliveira, Mafalda
AU - Saura, Cristina
AU - Gradishar, William
AU - Kim, Sung Bae
AU - Brufsky, Adam
AU - Hurvitz, Sara A.
AU - Ryvo, Larisa
AU - Fagnani, Daniele
AU - Kalmadi, Sujith
AU - Silverman, Paula
AU - Delaloge, Suzette
AU - Alarcon, Jesus
AU - Kwong, Ava
AU - Lee, Keun Seok
AU - Ang, Peter Cher Siang
AU - Ow, Samuel Guan Wei
AU - Chu, Sung Chao
AU - Bryce, Richard
AU - Keyvanjah, Kiana
AU - Bebchuk, Judith
AU - Zhang, Bo
AU - Oestreicher, Nina
AU - Bose, Ron
AU - Chan, Nancy
N1 - Funding Information:
Presented in part at the 43rd San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), Dec 4–8, 2020, San Antonio, TX, USA. We thank the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, study investigators, research staff, clinical research organizations, and other vendors, as well as the patients who participated in the NALA trial. We would like to acknowledge statistical programming support provided by Yan Yan and Dan DiPrimeo (Puma Biotechnology). We also thank Bethann Hromatka (Puma Biotechnology) for review and revision of the manuscript, and Chantal Dolan, Kathryn Fisher, Diana Matkin (CMD Consulting), and Lee Miller (Miller Medical Communications Ltd) for writing/editorial support.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Puma Biotechnology Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA [no grant number is applicable]. Puma Biotechnology Inc. funded the provision of editorial support provided by CMD Consulting and Miller Medical Communications.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Purpose: To characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study. Methods: In NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan–Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points. Results: Of the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63–1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32–2.23]). Conclusion: In NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC.
AB - Purpose: To characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study. Methods: In NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan–Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points. Results: Of the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63–1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32–2.23]). Conclusion: In NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC.
KW - HER2-positive
KW - Health-related quality of life
KW - Metastatic breast cancer
KW - Neratinib
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105406543&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-021-06217-4
DO - 10.1007/s10549-021-06217-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 33909203
AN - SCOPUS:85105406543
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 188
SP - 449
EP - 458
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 2
ER -