Neonatal intensive care unit quality initiative: Identifying preanalytical variables contributing to specimen hemolysis and measuring the impact of evidence-based practice interventions

  • Nicole V. Tolan
  • , Erin J. Kaleta
  • , Jennifer L. Fang
  • , Christopher E. Colby
  • , William A. Carey
  • , Brad S. Karon
  • , Nikola A. Baumann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Blood specimen hemolysis is a major cause of sample recollection in the neonatal intensive care unit. We aimed to reduce the hemolysis rate from 6.3% at baseline to less than 4% within the 9 months' duration of the study. Methods: Intravenous infusion of lipid emulsion during sample collection, sample collection site, and blood sample transportation methods were investigated as possible contributors to hemolysis. Subsequently, two practice improvements were implemented: pausing lipid emulsion infusion prior to collection and slowing withdrawal rates through arterial catheters. Results: Samples were more likely to be hemolyzed if they were collected during lipid infusion and subsequently transported by pneumatic tube or collected through an arterial catheter. Retrospective analysis demonstrated a decreased number of tests cancelled due to specimen hemolysis (3.5%) after our interventions. Conclusions: We identified three variables contributing to hemolysis and instituted two clinical practice interventions to significantly reduce test cancellations due to hemolysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-118
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of clinical pathology
Volume146
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Keywords

  • Arterial catheter draws
  • Clinical chemistry
  • Clinical practice intervention
  • Lipid emulsion infusion
  • Neonatal ICU
  • Quality improvement
  • Sample transport
  • Specimen hemolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neonatal intensive care unit quality initiative: Identifying preanalytical variables contributing to specimen hemolysis and measuring the impact of evidence-based practice interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this