National Pediatrician-Scientist Collaborative Workgroup comment on new ACGME requirements’ impact on pediatric physician-scientists

for the NPSCW, Daniel J. Moore, Weston Powell, Debra Boyer, Katherine Bline, Lyndsay Harshman, Andrew Nowalk, Audrea Burns, Jordan S. Orange, Daniel J. Moore, Audrea Burns, Kara L. Calkins, Emma Mohr, Bryce Binstadt, David Olson, Danielle Callaway, Kelly Harris, Jacquelyn D. Lajiness, Mel Heyman, Audra Nicole InessRebecca Blankenburg, Carrie Rassbach, Mark Allen Ward, Satid Thammasitboon, Tara Wenger, Weston Powell, Catherine Forster, Suong Nguyen, Michael D. Hogarty, Jordan S. Orange, Pnina Weiss, Ian Davis, Candace Gildner, Bobbi J. Byrne, Anthony French, Fernando Gonzalez, Andrew J. Nowalk, Briana Christophers, Jacqueline Ho, Rasheed Gbadegesin, Catherine S. Forster, Kate G. Ackerman, Stephanie D. Davis, Valerie A. Almenas, Katherine Bline, Lyndsay A. Harshman, Misty Good, James Bayrer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The ACGME recently released its recommendation for updates to the program requirements for pediatrics. These updates proposed changes to allocation of resident clinical time and a greater emphasis on individualization. The potential impact of these changes on the training of physician-scientists is discussed. Methods: Discussion of the proposed changes was held within the members of the National Pediatrician-Scientist Collaborative Workgroup, a group that represents scientists, trainees, program directors, chairs, and physician-scientist educators at nearly 30 residency programs from across the US with a focus on understanding and developing optimal approaches to physician-scientist training. Consideration was given to the both the personal and institutional impact of the proposal for physician-scientist development. Results: Both threats and opportunities were identified. Key opportunities include the enhanced individualized training time that could be used to explore research. Threats include re-allocation of clinical training time that may strain institutions financially, expand clinical service requirements for other early career stage individuals, and alter exposure to a broad range of pediatric specialists and sub-specialists that impact career development. Conclusion: The NPSCW encourages consideration of the impact of changing program requirements on physician-scientist development to include ongoing discussion amongst mentors, programs, and trainees to understand and mitigate impact of new program requirements on the development of pediatrician-scientists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-74
Number of pages5
JournalPediatric research
Volume95
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National Pediatrician-Scientist Collaborative Workgroup comment on new ACGME requirements’ impact on pediatric physician-scientists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this