TY - JOUR
T1 - National patterns of care and outcomes after combined modality therapy for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer
AU - Patel, Aalok P.
AU - Crabtree, Traves D.
AU - Bell, Jennifer M.
AU - Guthrie, Tracey J.
AU - Robinson, Clifford G.
AU - Morgensztern, Daniel
AU - Colditz, Graham A.
AU - Kreisel, Daniel
AU - Krupnick, A. Sasha
AU - Bradley, Jeffrey D.
AU - Patterson, G. Alexander
AU - Meyers, Bryan F.
AU - Puri, Varun
PY - 2014/5
Y1 - 2014/5
N2 - INTRODUCTION:: The role of surgery in addition to chemotherapy and radiation for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Because there are limited data on the benefit from surgery in this setting, we evaluated the use of combined modality therapy nationally and explored the outcomes with and without the addition of surgery. METHODS:: Patient variables and treatment-related outcomes were abstracted for patients with clinical stage IIIA NSCLC from the National Cancer Database. Patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation were compared with those undergoing chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery (CRS) in any sequence. RESULTS:: Between 1998 and 2010, 61,339 patients underwent combined modality treatment for clinical stage IIIA NSCLC. Of these, 51,979 (84.7%) received chemotherapy and radiation while 9360 (15.3%) underwent CRS. Patients in the CRS group were younger, more likely female patients and Caucasians, and had smaller tumors and lower Charlson comorbidity scores. The 30-day surgical mortality was 200 of 8993 (2.2%). The median overall survival favored the CRS group in both unmatched (32.4 months versus 15.7 months, p < 0.001) and matched analysis based on patient characteristics (34.3 versus 18.4 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:: There is significant heterogeneity in the treatment of stage IIIA NSCLC in the United States. Patients selected for surgery in addition to chemoradiation therapy seem to have better long-term survival.
AB - INTRODUCTION:: The role of surgery in addition to chemotherapy and radiation for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Because there are limited data on the benefit from surgery in this setting, we evaluated the use of combined modality therapy nationally and explored the outcomes with and without the addition of surgery. METHODS:: Patient variables and treatment-related outcomes were abstracted for patients with clinical stage IIIA NSCLC from the National Cancer Database. Patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation were compared with those undergoing chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery (CRS) in any sequence. RESULTS:: Between 1998 and 2010, 61,339 patients underwent combined modality treatment for clinical stage IIIA NSCLC. Of these, 51,979 (84.7%) received chemotherapy and radiation while 9360 (15.3%) underwent CRS. Patients in the CRS group were younger, more likely female patients and Caucasians, and had smaller tumors and lower Charlson comorbidity scores. The 30-day surgical mortality was 200 of 8993 (2.2%). The median overall survival favored the CRS group in both unmatched (32.4 months versus 15.7 months, p < 0.001) and matched analysis based on patient characteristics (34.3 versus 18.4 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:: There is significant heterogeneity in the treatment of stage IIIA NSCLC in the United States. Patients selected for surgery in addition to chemoradiation therapy seem to have better long-term survival.
KW - Non-small-cell lung cancer
KW - Outcomes
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899083312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000152
DO - 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000152
M3 - Article
C2 - 24722151
AN - SCOPUS:84899083312
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 9
SP - 612
EP - 621
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 5
ER -