National Cancer Institute's Working Group on Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Clinical Trial Design Considerations

  • David J. Einstein
  • , Melissa L. Abel
  • , Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching
  • , Philip M. Arlen
  • , Karen A. Autio
  • , Marijo Bilusic
  • , Michael A. Carducci
  • , Peter L. Choyke
  • , Deborah E. Citrin
  • , William D. Figg
  • , Julie N. Graff
  • , James L. Gulley
  • , Susan Halabi
  • , Fatima Karzai
  • , Liza Lindenberg
  • , Mark C. Markowski
  • , Catherine H. Marshall
  • , Douglas G. McNeel
  • , Esther Mena
  • , Helen Moon
  • Russell K. Pachynski, Channing J. Paller, Krishnan R. Patel, Edwin M. Posadas, Kenneth J. Pienta, Meredith M. Regan, Laura A. Sena, Charlotte S. Walmsley, Xiao X. Wei, Evan Y. Yu, Phuoc T. Tran, Ravi A. Madan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE – Biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive surgery and/or radiation (including salvage strategies) is a burgeoning area of clinical research inspired by ultrasensitive next-generation imaging. Most phase III trials in PCa have focused on metastatic disease, defined by conventional imaging. Despite the emergence of new imaging, clinical trial principles from metastatic studies will not optimize future BCR trials. METHODS – A Working Group convened at the National Cancer Institute on November 13, 2024 (NCI BCR WG). Key areas of discussion included nomenclature, baseline criteria for data capture, imaging considerations, delineation of high-risk populations to be targeted for trial development, requirements of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or hormonal therapy, quality-of-life considerations, and potential study end points. RESULTS – The NCI BCR WG defined the novel term “prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)+BCR” to identify the emerging concept of recurrent PCa identifiable only on PSMA positron emission tomography (PET), overlapping with BCR and distinct from metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa as traditionally defined by conventional imaging. The WG suggested defining high-risk BCR with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤6 months, regardless of PET findings. The WG provided recommendations for baseline data capture and imaging requirements. Neither systemic therapy nor MDT were considered mandatory for control arms. The WG also discussed novel end points and quality-of-life metrics in this disease space. CONCLUSION – These discussions should inform future clinical BCR trials in this distinct disease space relative to metastatic disease defined by conventional imaging. The NCI BCR WG strongly advocates that future trials explore deintensification of treatment to minimize toxicity in this relatively indolent disease state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3672-3683
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume43
Issue number34
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National Cancer Institute's Working Group on Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Clinical Trial Design Considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this