TY - JOUR
T1 - Myocardial protection with potassium-channel openers is as effective as St. Thomas' solution in the rabbit heart
AU - Lawton, Jennifer S.
AU - Sepic, Jerry D.
AU - Allen, Cynthia T.
AU - Hsia, Peng Wie
AU - Damiano, Ralph J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the help of Luke Wolfe with statistical analysis, the generous donation of pinacidil by Leo Pharmaceuticals, Ballerup, Denmark, and the generous gift of aprikalim by Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France. This work has been supported by a National Institutes of Health National Research Service Award grant HL09125-02 (J.S.L., R.J.D.) and National Institutes of Health R01 HL51032 (R.J.D.).
PY - 1996/7
Y1 - 1996/7
N2 - Background. Previous work from our laboratory has demonstrated the advantage of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium-channel openers as cardioplegic agents when compared with hyperkalemic (20 mmol/L KCl) Krebs-Henseleit solution. However, Krebs-Henseleit with 20 mmol/L KCl is not an ideal hyperkalemic cardioplegia. Therefore, we investigated the hypothesis that hyperpolarized arrest with pinacidil and aprikalim could provide equal or superior myocardial protection to hyperkalemic arrest with the widely accepted St. Thomas' solution. Methods. Myocardial protection was compared in the blood-perfused isolated parabiotic rabbit heart Langendorff model. Twenty-four hearts were protected with a 50-mL infusion of cardioplegia for a 30-minute global normothermic ischemic period followed by 30 minutes of reperfusion. Systolic function (percent recovery of developed pressure) and the diastolic properties of the left ventricle were measured. Coronary blood flow was measured throughout each experiment. Results. The percent recovery of developed pressure (mean ± standard error of the mean) for St. Thomas' solution, pinacidil, and aprikalim was 53.1% ± 5.4%, 64.0% ± 3.0%, and 62.4% ± 3.2%, respectively. The time (minutes) until mechanical and electrical arrest was significantly longer in the pinacidil (4.82 ± 0.10 and 12.06 ± 1.07) and aprikalim (3.33 ± 0.28 and 11.12 ± 0.94) groups when compared with the St. Thomas group (1.84 ± 0.74, and 3.17 ± 1.44). Coronary blood flow upon reperfusion was significantly greater in the pinacidil (16.4 ± 2.1 mL/min) and aprikalim (19.4 ± 2.8 mL/min) groups compared with the St. Thomas' solution group (8.0 ± 1.0 mL/min), and this returned to baseline after 15 minutes of reperfusion. Conclusions. Myocardial protection-with pinacidil and aprikalim is comparable with that of St. Thomas' solution in the blood-perfused isolated rabbit heart despite prolonged mechanical and electrical activity during ischemia.
AB - Background. Previous work from our laboratory has demonstrated the advantage of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium-channel openers as cardioplegic agents when compared with hyperkalemic (20 mmol/L KCl) Krebs-Henseleit solution. However, Krebs-Henseleit with 20 mmol/L KCl is not an ideal hyperkalemic cardioplegia. Therefore, we investigated the hypothesis that hyperpolarized arrest with pinacidil and aprikalim could provide equal or superior myocardial protection to hyperkalemic arrest with the widely accepted St. Thomas' solution. Methods. Myocardial protection was compared in the blood-perfused isolated parabiotic rabbit heart Langendorff model. Twenty-four hearts were protected with a 50-mL infusion of cardioplegia for a 30-minute global normothermic ischemic period followed by 30 minutes of reperfusion. Systolic function (percent recovery of developed pressure) and the diastolic properties of the left ventricle were measured. Coronary blood flow was measured throughout each experiment. Results. The percent recovery of developed pressure (mean ± standard error of the mean) for St. Thomas' solution, pinacidil, and aprikalim was 53.1% ± 5.4%, 64.0% ± 3.0%, and 62.4% ± 3.2%, respectively. The time (minutes) until mechanical and electrical arrest was significantly longer in the pinacidil (4.82 ± 0.10 and 12.06 ± 1.07) and aprikalim (3.33 ± 0.28 and 11.12 ± 0.94) groups when compared with the St. Thomas group (1.84 ± 0.74, and 3.17 ± 1.44). Coronary blood flow upon reperfusion was significantly greater in the pinacidil (16.4 ± 2.1 mL/min) and aprikalim (19.4 ± 2.8 mL/min) groups compared with the St. Thomas' solution group (8.0 ± 1.0 mL/min), and this returned to baseline after 15 minutes of reperfusion. Conclusions. Myocardial protection-with pinacidil and aprikalim is comparable with that of St. Thomas' solution in the blood-perfused isolated rabbit heart despite prolonged mechanical and electrical activity during ischemia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030200213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00260-3
DO - 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00260-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 8678673
AN - SCOPUS:0030200213
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 62
SP - 31
EP - 39
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 1
ER -