TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutation-specific RAS oncogenicity explains NRAS codon 61 selection in melanoma
AU - Burd, Christin E.
AU - Liu, Wenjin
AU - Huynh, Minh V.
AU - Waqas, Meriam A.
AU - Gillahan, James E.
AU - Clark, Kelly S.
AU - Fu, Kailing
AU - Martin, Brit L.
AU - Jeck, William R.
AU - Souroullas, George P.
AU - Darr, David B.
AU - Zedek, Daniel C.
AU - Miley, Michael J.
AU - Baguley, Bruce C.
AU - Campbell, Sharon L.
AU - Sharpless, Norman E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - NRAS mutation at codons 12, 13, or 61 is associated with transformation; yet, in melanoma, such alterations are nearly exclusive to codon 61. Here, we compared the melanoma susceptibility of an NrasQ61R knock-in allele to similarly designed KrasG12D and NrasG12D alleles. With concomitant p16 INK4a inactivation, Kras G12D or Nras Q61R expression efficiently promoted melanoma in vivo , whereas NrasG12D did not. In addition, NrasQ61R mutation potently cooperated with Lkb1 / Stk11 loss to induce highly metastatic disease. Functional comparisons of Nras Q61R and NrasG12D revealed little difference in the ability of these proteins to engage PI3K or RAF. Instead, Nras Q61R showed enhanced nucleotide binding, decreased intrinsic GTPase activity, and increased stability when compared with Nras G12D. This work identifies a faithful model of human NRAS -mutant melanoma, and suggests that the increased melanomagenecity of NrasQ61R over NrasG12D is due to heightened abundance of the active, GTP-bound form rather than differences in the engagement of downstream effector pathways.SIGNIFICANCE: This work explains the curious predominance in human melanoma of mutations of codon 61 of NRAS over other oncogenic NRAS mutations. Using conditional “knock-in” mouse models, we show that physiologic expression of NRAS Q61R , but not NRAS G12D , drives melanoma formation.
AB - NRAS mutation at codons 12, 13, or 61 is associated with transformation; yet, in melanoma, such alterations are nearly exclusive to codon 61. Here, we compared the melanoma susceptibility of an NrasQ61R knock-in allele to similarly designed KrasG12D and NrasG12D alleles. With concomitant p16 INK4a inactivation, Kras G12D or Nras Q61R expression efficiently promoted melanoma in vivo , whereas NrasG12D did not. In addition, NrasQ61R mutation potently cooperated with Lkb1 / Stk11 loss to induce highly metastatic disease. Functional comparisons of Nras Q61R and NrasG12D revealed little difference in the ability of these proteins to engage PI3K or RAF. Instead, Nras Q61R showed enhanced nucleotide binding, decreased intrinsic GTPase activity, and increased stability when compared with Nras G12D. This work identifies a faithful model of human NRAS -mutant melanoma, and suggests that the increased melanomagenecity of NrasQ61R over NrasG12D is due to heightened abundance of the active, GTP-bound form rather than differences in the engagement of downstream effector pathways.SIGNIFICANCE: This work explains the curious predominance in human melanoma of mutations of codon 61 of NRAS over other oncogenic NRAS mutations. Using conditional “knock-in” mouse models, we show that physiologic expression of NRAS Q61R , but not NRAS G12D , drives melanoma formation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964315916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0729
DO - 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0729
M3 - Article
C2 - 25252692
AN - SCOPUS:84964315916
SN - 2159-8274
VL - 4
SP - 1418
EP - 1429
JO - Cancer discovery
JF - Cancer discovery
IS - 12
ER -