Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval

  • Gilles O. Einstein
  • , Ruthann Thomas
  • , Sara Mayfield
  • , Hilary Shank
  • , Mark A. McDaniel
  • , Nova Morrisette
  • , Jennifer Breneiser

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

475 Scopus citations

Abstract

Theoretically, prospective memory retrieval can be accomplished either by controlled monitoring of the environment for a target event or by a more reflexive process that spontaneously responds to the presence of a target event. These views were evaluated in Experiments 1-4 by examining whether performing a prospective memory task produced costs on the speed of performing the ongoing task. In Experiment 5, the authors directly tested for the existence of spontaneous retrieval. The results supported the multi-process theory (M. A. McDaniel & G. O. Einstein, 2000) predictions that (a) spontaneous retrieval can occur and can support good prospective memory and (b) depending on task demands and individual differences, people rely to different degrees on monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval for prospective remembering.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-342
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005

Keywords

  • Monitoring theory
  • Multiprocess theory
  • Prospective memory
  • Spontaneous retrieval theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this