TY - JOUR
T1 - Multimodal Ambulatory Monitoring of Daily Activity and Health-Related Symptoms in Community-Dwelling Survivors of Stroke
T2 - Feasibility, Acceptability, and Validity
AU - Lau, Stephen C.L.
AU - Connor, Lisa Tabor
AU - King, Allison A.
AU - Baum, Carolyn M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Program in Occupational Therapy Dissertation Fund, Washington University in St. Louis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Objective: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring, which combines accelerometry with ecological momentary assessment (EMA), to assess daily activity and health-related symptoms among survivors of stroke. Design: Prospective cohort study involving 7 days of ambulatory monitoring; participants completed 8 daily EMA surveys about daily activity and symptoms (mood, cognitive complaints, fatigue, pain) while wearing an accelerometer. Participants also completed retrospective assessments and an acceptability questionnaire. Setting: Community. Participants: Forty survivors of stroke (N=40). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility was determined using attrition rate and compliance. Acceptability was reported using the acceptability questionnaire. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by the correlations between ambulatory monitoring and retrospective self-reports. Criterion validity was determined by the concordance between accelerometer-measured and EMA-reported daily activity. Results: All participants completed the study (attrition rate=0%). EMA and accelerometer compliance were 93.6 % and 99.7%, respectively. Participants rated their experience with multimodal ambulatory monitoring positively. They were highly satisfied (mean, 4.8/5) and confident (mean, 4.7/5) in using ambulatory monitoring and preferred it over traditional retrospective assessments (mean, 4.7/5). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring estimates correlated with retrospective self-reports of the same and opposing constructs in the predicted directions (r=−0.66 to 0.72, P<.05). More intense accelerometer-measured physical activity was observed when participants reported doing more physically demanding activities and vice versa. Conclusions: Findings support the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring in survivors of mild stroke. Multimodal ambulatory monitoring has potential to provide a more complete understanding of survivors’ daily activity in the context of everyday life.
AB - Objective: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring, which combines accelerometry with ecological momentary assessment (EMA), to assess daily activity and health-related symptoms among survivors of stroke. Design: Prospective cohort study involving 7 days of ambulatory monitoring; participants completed 8 daily EMA surveys about daily activity and symptoms (mood, cognitive complaints, fatigue, pain) while wearing an accelerometer. Participants also completed retrospective assessments and an acceptability questionnaire. Setting: Community. Participants: Forty survivors of stroke (N=40). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility was determined using attrition rate and compliance. Acceptability was reported using the acceptability questionnaire. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by the correlations between ambulatory monitoring and retrospective self-reports. Criterion validity was determined by the concordance between accelerometer-measured and EMA-reported daily activity. Results: All participants completed the study (attrition rate=0%). EMA and accelerometer compliance were 93.6 % and 99.7%, respectively. Participants rated their experience with multimodal ambulatory monitoring positively. They were highly satisfied (mean, 4.8/5) and confident (mean, 4.7/5) in using ambulatory monitoring and preferred it over traditional retrospective assessments (mean, 4.7/5). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring estimates correlated with retrospective self-reports of the same and opposing constructs in the predicted directions (r=−0.66 to 0.72, P<.05). More intense accelerometer-measured physical activity was observed when participants reported doing more physically demanding activities and vice versa. Conclusions: Findings support the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring in survivors of mild stroke. Multimodal ambulatory monitoring has potential to provide a more complete understanding of survivors’ daily activity in the context of everyday life.
KW - Accelerometry
KW - Ecological momentary assessment
KW - Outcome assessment (health care)
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Stroke
KW - Telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135189583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35780826
AN - SCOPUS:85135189583
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 103
SP - 1992
EP - 2000
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 10
ER -