TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter US Clinical Trial with an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults
T2 - Final Outcomes
AU - Pillsbury, Harold C.
AU - DIllon, Margaret T.
AU - Buchman, Craig A.
AU - Staecker, Hinrich
AU - Prentiss, Sandra M.
AU - Ruckenstein, Michael J.
AU - Bigelow, Douglas C.
AU - Telischi, Fred F.
AU - Martinez, DIane M.
AU - Runge, Christina L.
AU - Friedland, David R.
AU - Blevins, Nikolas H.
AU - Larky, Jannine B.
AU - Alexiades, George
AU - Kaylie, David M.
AU - Roland, Peter S.
AU - Miyamoto, Richard T.
AU - Backous, Douglas D.
AU - Warren, Frank M.
AU - El-Kashlan, Hussam K.
AU - Slager, Heidi K.
AU - Reyes, Carisa
AU - Racey, Allison I.
AU - Adunka, Oliver F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Objective: To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MED-EL Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System, for adults with residual low-frequency hearing and severe-to-profound hearing loss in the mid to high frequencies. Study Design: Prospective, repeated measures. Setting: Multicenter, hospital. Patients: Seventy-three subjects implanted with PULSAR or SONATA cochlear implants with FLEX 24 electrode arrays. Intervention: Subjects were fit postoperatively with an audio processor, combining electric stimulation and acoustic amplification. Main Outcome Measures: Unaided thresholds were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postactivation. Speech perception was assessed at these intervals using City University of New York sentences in noise and consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet. Subjective benefit was assessed at these intervals via the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale questionnaires. Results: Sixty-seven of 73 subjects (92%) completed outcome measures for all study intervals. Of those 67 subjects, 79% experienced less than a 30 dB HL low-frequency pure-tone average (250-1000 Hz) shift, and 97% were able to use the acoustic unit at 12 months postactivation. In the EAS condition, 94% of subjects performed similarly to or better than their preoperative performance on City University of New York sentences in noise at 12 months postactivation, with 85% demonstrating improvement. Ninety-seven percent of subjects performed similarly or better on consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet, with 84% demonstrating improvement. Conclusion: The MED-EL EAS System is a safe and effective treatment option for adults with normal hearing to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in the high frequencies who do not benefit from traditional amplification.
AB - Objective: To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MED-EL Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System, for adults with residual low-frequency hearing and severe-to-profound hearing loss in the mid to high frequencies. Study Design: Prospective, repeated measures. Setting: Multicenter, hospital. Patients: Seventy-three subjects implanted with PULSAR or SONATA cochlear implants with FLEX 24 electrode arrays. Intervention: Subjects were fit postoperatively with an audio processor, combining electric stimulation and acoustic amplification. Main Outcome Measures: Unaided thresholds were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postactivation. Speech perception was assessed at these intervals using City University of New York sentences in noise and consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet. Subjective benefit was assessed at these intervals via the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale questionnaires. Results: Sixty-seven of 73 subjects (92%) completed outcome measures for all study intervals. Of those 67 subjects, 79% experienced less than a 30 dB HL low-frequency pure-tone average (250-1000 Hz) shift, and 97% were able to use the acoustic unit at 12 months postactivation. In the EAS condition, 94% of subjects performed similarly to or better than their preoperative performance on City University of New York sentences in noise at 12 months postactivation, with 85% demonstrating improvement. Ninety-seven percent of subjects performed similarly or better on consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet, with 84% demonstrating improvement. Conclusion: The MED-EL EAS System is a safe and effective treatment option for adults with normal hearing to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in the high frequencies who do not benefit from traditional amplification.
KW - Cochlear implant
KW - Electric-acoustic stimulation
KW - Hearing preservation
KW - Hybrid cochlear implant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042489455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001691
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001691
M3 - Article
C2 - 29342054
AN - SCOPUS:85042489455
SN - 1531-7129
VL - 39
SP - 299
EP - 305
JO - Otology and Neurotology
JF - Otology and Neurotology
IS - 3
ER -