TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter Evaluation of a New Strip-Based Blood Glucose System for Point-of-Care Testing in Critical and Non-Critical Care Settings
AU - Goodman, Michael
AU - Bercker, Sven
AU - Breitenbeck, Nancy
AU - Canada-Vilalta, Cristina
AU - Canepa, Daisy D.
AU - Clarke, William A.
AU - Farnsworth, Christopher W.
AU - Ganser, Edward O.
AU - Geerts, Nienke
AU - Goldsmith, Barbara
AU - Headden, Gary
AU - Hoppensteadt, Debra
AU - Klapperich, Birgit
AU - Matika, Ryan
AU - Miles, Gabrielle
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Sagori
AU - Nichols, James H.
AU - O’Dell, Rebecca M.
AU - Rafique, Zubaid
AU - Schuetzenmeister, Andre
AU - Slingerland, Robbert
AU - Stankiewicz, Ann F.
AU - Swanson, Jonathan R.
AU - Tran, Nam K.
AU - Wu, Alan H.B.
AU - Karon, Brad S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Diabetes Technology Society.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Evaluation of the performance of Cobas® Pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), a new blood glucose (BG) monitoring system (BGMS; referred to here as BGMSA) intended for point-of-care testing using samples from patients in diverse clinical settings by intended point-of-care test operators. Methods: Arterial, capillary, venous, or heel stick whole blood (WB) samples from patients in non-critical and critical care settings were collected and analyzed using BGMSA and the Nova StatStrip® BGMS (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA; referred to here as BGMSB), and a hexokinase comparator (Cobas 6000 Analyzer Series; Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The blood glucose measurement accuracy was assessed by the Food and Drug Administration guidance criteria. Results: Two studies are presented. In the first, 2678 samples (622 arterial, 706 capillary, 1203 venous, 147 heel stick) were collected from 1577 patients in 14 US and three European sites. All accuracy criteria were met for arterial and venous samples considering all data combined. BGMSA showed better accuracy than BGMSB for arterial, venous, and heel stick, and similar results to BGMSB for capillary WB vs venous comparator. No endogenous interference from pO2, hematocrit, and sodium was identified. BGMSA was also accurate when analyzing contrived samples used to show accuracy over a wide range of glucose concentrations, alone and when combined with extreme hematocrit. In the second study, 117 capillary fingerstick samples collected at one US site were measured on both BGMSA and the comparator, and all accuracy criteria were met. No clinically significant medical risks were observed via Diabetes Technology Society Error Grids. Conclusions: BGMSA was effective for determining blood glucose in venous, arterial, neonatal arterial, neonatal heel stick, and capillary WB samples.
AB - Background: Evaluation of the performance of Cobas® Pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), a new blood glucose (BG) monitoring system (BGMS; referred to here as BGMSA) intended for point-of-care testing using samples from patients in diverse clinical settings by intended point-of-care test operators. Methods: Arterial, capillary, venous, or heel stick whole blood (WB) samples from patients in non-critical and critical care settings were collected and analyzed using BGMSA and the Nova StatStrip® BGMS (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA; referred to here as BGMSB), and a hexokinase comparator (Cobas 6000 Analyzer Series; Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The blood glucose measurement accuracy was assessed by the Food and Drug Administration guidance criteria. Results: Two studies are presented. In the first, 2678 samples (622 arterial, 706 capillary, 1203 venous, 147 heel stick) were collected from 1577 patients in 14 US and three European sites. All accuracy criteria were met for arterial and venous samples considering all data combined. BGMSA showed better accuracy than BGMSB for arterial, venous, and heel stick, and similar results to BGMSB for capillary WB vs venous comparator. No endogenous interference from pO2, hematocrit, and sodium was identified. BGMSA was also accurate when analyzing contrived samples used to show accuracy over a wide range of glucose concentrations, alone and when combined with extreme hematocrit. In the second study, 117 capillary fingerstick samples collected at one US site were measured on both BGMSA and the comparator, and all accuracy criteria were met. No clinically significant medical risks were observed via Diabetes Technology Society Error Grids. Conclusions: BGMSA was effective for determining blood glucose in venous, arterial, neonatal arterial, neonatal heel stick, and capillary WB samples.
KW - accuracy
KW - blood glucose monitoring systems
KW - critical care
KW - point-of-care
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007150441
U2 - 10.1177/19322968251325873
DO - 10.1177/19322968251325873
M3 - Article
C2 - 40448557
AN - SCOPUS:105007150441
SN - 1932-2968
JO - Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
JF - Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
M1 - 19322968251325873
ER -