Multi-investigator collaboration in orthopedic surgery research compared to other medical fields: Update comparing 2021−2009

Andrew W. Kuhn, Joseph M. Rund, Brian R. Wolf, Robert H. Brophy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of multicenter studies in the orthopedic literature compared to general medicine and other surgical subspecialty studies as an update to a previous study. The number of multicenter research studies across three orthopedic surgery journals was higher in 2021 compared to 2009 (7.2% [95% CI: 5.1%−9.4%, χ2 [df = 1 = 43.8]], p < 0.0001), as was the number of authors and institutions listed on clinical research studies. While these trends in multicenter research publishing are encouraging, orthopedic surgery still lags behind the general medicine and other surgical subspecialty literature bases. Of the 934 orthopedic surgery studies published, 92 (9.9%) were multicenter studies compared to 64.4% of the general medicine and 26.9% of the other surgical subspecialty studies (χ2 [df = 2] = 472.6, p < 0.001). Multicenter trials conducted in orthopedics have fundamentally changed musculoskeletal care, affecting the lives of millions of patients. Participation in multicenter research should be encouraged and prioritized through continued advocacy, funding, support, and direction from orthopedic governing bodies, journals, and subspecialty groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-877
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • collaborative
  • multicenter
  • orthopedic surgery
  • research
  • trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-investigator collaboration in orthopedic surgery research compared to other medical fields: Update comparing 2021−2009'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this