MR imaging evaluation of knee collateral ligaments and related injuries: Comparison of T1‐weighted, T2‐weighted, and fat‐saturated T2‐weighted sequences—correlation with clinical findings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare the ability of T1‐weighted (T1W), proton density/T2‐weighted (PD/T2W), and fat saturation (FS) PD/T2W magnetic resonance (MR) sequences for depiction of the knee collateral ligaments and related injuries, and to compare MR findings with clinical findings. Ten subjects with normal knee ligaments and 64 patients with suspected collateral ligament injuries underwent coronal T1W, PD/T2W, and FS PD/T2W imaging. Abnormalities ranged from edema surrounding the collateral ligaments (grade I) to complete disruption of ligamentous fibers (grade III). FS PD/T2W images improved definition of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) compared with other sequences in 78% and 81% of patients, respectively. While the apparent grade of collateral ligament injury was similar with all pulse sequences in most patients, depiction of such injury was usually most conspicuous on FS PD/T2W images (MCL, 92% of patients; LCL, 38% of patients). In no patients were clinically diagnosed collateral ligament injuries undetected or understaged with MR imaging. MR findings indicated higher‐grade MCL and LCL injuries than did clinical examination in 24 and 15 patients, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)725-732
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume4
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Keywords

  • Iigaments, menisci. and cartilage, 4527.4857
  • Knee, injuries 4527.4857
  • Ligaments, MR, 4527.121411, 4527.121415
  • Ligaments, injuries, 4527.4857

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MR imaging evaluation of knee collateral ligaments and related injuries: Comparison of T1‐weighted, T2‐weighted, and fat‐saturated T2‐weighted sequences—correlation with clinical findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this