TY - JOUR
T1 - Monitoring of antiviral therapy with quantitative evaluation of hbeag
T2 - A comparison with HBV DNA testing
AU - Perrillo, Robert
AU - Mimms, Larry
AU - Schechtman, Kenneth
AU - Robbins, David
AU - Campbell, Carolyn
PY - 1993/12
Y1 - 1993/12
N2 - The serological endpoint of response in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B is the loss of hepatitis B virus DNA and HBeAg. Because the quantitative measurement of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum has been shown to be useful for monitoring and predicting response to interferon‐α therapy, we decided to evaluate whether changes in HBeAg concentration could also be used in this manner. Twenty‐nine patients who were initially positive for HBeAg and HBV DNA were serially evaluated for HBeAg concentration with a microparticle‐capture enzyme immunoassay. HBeAg levels in serum were calculated by means of comparison with a standard curve of fluorescence rate vs. HBeAg concentration. The results, expressed in milliunits per milliliter, were compared with hepatitis B virus DNA levels determined by means of solution hybridization. The baseline HBeAg concentration proved to be the best independent predictor of response on stepwise Cox regression analysis (p = 0.026). Similar disappearance curves were observed for the two markers, although hepatitis B virus DNA became undetectable at an earlier interval in 13 of 16 cases (81%). In the 16 responders, a decline in HBeAg concentration of more than 90% was observed by wk 12 of therapy (mean ± S.D., 95% ± 13%). Nonresponders did not demonstrate such steep declines in HBeAg values by wk 12 (mean ± S.D., 45% ± 27%), and levels tended to increase at subsequent time points. We conclude that serial monitoring of HBeAg concentration with a technique that should be readily adaptable to clinical laboratories may be useful in the initial evaluation and monitoring of patients undergoing antiviral therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 1993;18:1306–1312.)
AB - The serological endpoint of response in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B is the loss of hepatitis B virus DNA and HBeAg. Because the quantitative measurement of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum has been shown to be useful for monitoring and predicting response to interferon‐α therapy, we decided to evaluate whether changes in HBeAg concentration could also be used in this manner. Twenty‐nine patients who were initially positive for HBeAg and HBV DNA were serially evaluated for HBeAg concentration with a microparticle‐capture enzyme immunoassay. HBeAg levels in serum were calculated by means of comparison with a standard curve of fluorescence rate vs. HBeAg concentration. The results, expressed in milliunits per milliliter, were compared with hepatitis B virus DNA levels determined by means of solution hybridization. The baseline HBeAg concentration proved to be the best independent predictor of response on stepwise Cox regression analysis (p = 0.026). Similar disappearance curves were observed for the two markers, although hepatitis B virus DNA became undetectable at an earlier interval in 13 of 16 cases (81%). In the 16 responders, a decline in HBeAg concentration of more than 90% was observed by wk 12 of therapy (mean ± S.D., 95% ± 13%). Nonresponders did not demonstrate such steep declines in HBeAg values by wk 12 (mean ± S.D., 45% ± 27%), and levels tended to increase at subsequent time points. We conclude that serial monitoring of HBeAg concentration with a technique that should be readily adaptable to clinical laboratories may be useful in the initial evaluation and monitoring of patients undergoing antiviral therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 1993;18:1306–1312.)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027486290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hep.1840180604
DO - 10.1002/hep.1840180604
M3 - Article
C2 - 8244253
AN - SCOPUS:0027486290
SN - 0270-9139
VL - 18
SP - 1306
EP - 1312
JO - Hepatology
JF - Hepatology
IS - 6
ER -