TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the Bioactivation and Subsequent Reactivity of Drugs
AU - Hughes, Tyler B.
AU - Flynn, Noah
AU - Dang, Na Le
AU - Swamidass, S. Joshua
N1 - Funding Information:
We are also grateful to the developers of the open-source chemoinformatics tools Open Babel and RDKit. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01GM140635, R01LM012222, and R01LM012482. Computations were performed using the facilities of the Washington University Center for High Performance Computing, which were partially funded by National Institutes of Health grants numbers 1S10RR022984-01A1 and 1S10OD018091-01. We also thank both the Department of Immunology and Pathology at the Washington University School of Medicine and the Washington University Center for Biological Systems Engineering for their generous support of this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2021/2/15
Y1 - 2021/2/15
N2 - Electrophilically reactive drug metabolites are implicated in many adverse drug reactions. In this mechanism - termed bioactivation - metabolic enzymes convert drugs into reactive metabolites that often conjugate to nucleophilic sites within biological macromolecules like proteins. Toxic metabolite-product adducts induce severe immune responses that can cause sometimes fatal disorders, most commonly in the form of liver injury, blood dyscrasia, or the dermatologic conditions toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. This study models four of the most common metabolic transformations that result in bioactivation: quinone formation, epoxidation, thiophene sulfur-oxidation, and nitroaromatic reduction, by synthesizing models of metabolism and reactivity. First, the metabolism models predict the formation probabilities of all possible metabolites among the pathways studied. Second, the exact structures of these metabolites are enumerated. Third, using these structures, the reactivity model predicts the reactivity of each metabolite. Finally, a feedfoward neural network converts the metabolism and reactivity predictions to a bioactivation prediction for each possible metabolite. These bioactivation predictions represent the joint probability that a metabolite forms and that this metabolite subsequently conjugates to protein or glutathione. Among molecules bioactivated by these pathways, we predicted the correct pathway with an AUC accuracy of 89.98%. Furthermore, the model predicts whether molecules will be bioactivated, distinguishing bioactivated and nonbioactivated molecules with 81.06% AUC. We applied this algorithm to withdrawn drugs. The known bioactivation pathways of alclofenac and benzbromarone were identified by the algorithm, and high probability bioactivation pathways not yet confirmed were identified for safrazine, zimelidine, and astemizole. This bioactivation model - the first of its kind that jointly considers both metabolism and reactivity - enables drug candidates to be quickly evaluated for a toxicity risk that often evades detection during preclinical trials. The XenoSite bioactivation model is available at http://swami.wustl.edu/xenosite/p/bioactivation.
AB - Electrophilically reactive drug metabolites are implicated in many adverse drug reactions. In this mechanism - termed bioactivation - metabolic enzymes convert drugs into reactive metabolites that often conjugate to nucleophilic sites within biological macromolecules like proteins. Toxic metabolite-product adducts induce severe immune responses that can cause sometimes fatal disorders, most commonly in the form of liver injury, blood dyscrasia, or the dermatologic conditions toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. This study models four of the most common metabolic transformations that result in bioactivation: quinone formation, epoxidation, thiophene sulfur-oxidation, and nitroaromatic reduction, by synthesizing models of metabolism and reactivity. First, the metabolism models predict the formation probabilities of all possible metabolites among the pathways studied. Second, the exact structures of these metabolites are enumerated. Third, using these structures, the reactivity model predicts the reactivity of each metabolite. Finally, a feedfoward neural network converts the metabolism and reactivity predictions to a bioactivation prediction for each possible metabolite. These bioactivation predictions represent the joint probability that a metabolite forms and that this metabolite subsequently conjugates to protein or glutathione. Among molecules bioactivated by these pathways, we predicted the correct pathway with an AUC accuracy of 89.98%. Furthermore, the model predicts whether molecules will be bioactivated, distinguishing bioactivated and nonbioactivated molecules with 81.06% AUC. We applied this algorithm to withdrawn drugs. The known bioactivation pathways of alclofenac and benzbromarone were identified by the algorithm, and high probability bioactivation pathways not yet confirmed were identified for safrazine, zimelidine, and astemizole. This bioactivation model - the first of its kind that jointly considers both metabolism and reactivity - enables drug candidates to be quickly evaluated for a toxicity risk that often evades detection during preclinical trials. The XenoSite bioactivation model is available at http://swami.wustl.edu/xenosite/p/bioactivation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100675456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00417
DO - 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00417
M3 - Article
C2 - 33496184
AN - SCOPUS:85100675456
VL - 34
SP - 584
EP - 600
JO - Chemical Research in Toxicology
JF - Chemical Research in Toxicology
SN - 0893-228X
IS - 2
ER -