Modeling and calculating the effect of treatment at baseline from panel outcomes

  • Siddhartha Chib
  • , Liana Jacobi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We propose and examine a panel data model for isolating the effect of a treatment, taken once at baseline, from outcomes observed over subsequent time periods. In the model, the treatment intake and outcomes are assumed to be correlated, due to unobserved or unmeasured confounders. Intake is partly determined by a set of instrumental variables and the confounding on unobservables is modeled in a flexible way, varying both by time and treatment state. Covariate effects are assumed to be subject-specific and potentially correlated with other covariates. Estimation and inference is by Bayesian methods that are implemented by tuned Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Because our analysis is based on the framework developed by Chib [2004. Analysis of treatment response data without the joint distribution of counterfactuals. Journal of Econometrics, in press], the modeling and estimation does not involve either the unknowable joint distribution of the potential outcomes or the missing counterfactuals. The problem of model choice through marginal likelihoods and Bayes factors is also considered. The methods are illustrated in simulation experiments and in an application dealing with the effect of participation in high school athletics on future labor market earnings.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)781-801
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Econometrics
    Volume140
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 2007

    Keywords

    • Confounding
    • Heterogeneity
    • Instrumental variable
    • Marginal likelihood
    • Markov chain Monte Carlo
    • Metropolis-Hastings algorithm
    • Non-randomly assigned treatment
    • Panel data
    • Potential outcomes
    • Treatment effect

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling and calculating the effect of treatment at baseline from panel outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this