Mobile gamma cameras: a comparative evaluation

H. D. Royal; P. H. Brown; B. C. Claunch

doi:10.1148/128.1.229

Mobile gamma cameras: a comparative evaluation

H. D. Royal
, P. H. Brown
, B. C. Claunch

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Mobile gamma cameras from three manufacturers were evaluated. Count rate capability, flood uniformity, intrinsic and extrinsic spatial resolution, and sensitivity were compared, using images made under reproducible conditions with phantoms which simulate actual clinical situations.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	229-234
Number of pages	6
Journal	Radiology
Volume	128
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1148/128.1.229
State	Published - 1978

Access to Document

10.1148/128.1.229

Cite this

@article{87e74a29f9ae44a3b15cb0d4ccbba149,

title = "Mobile gamma cameras: a comparative evaluation",

abstract = "Mobile gamma cameras from three manufacturers were evaluated. Count rate capability, flood uniformity, intrinsic and extrinsic spatial resolution, and sensitivity were compared, using images made under reproducible conditions with phantoms which simulate actual clinical situations.",

author = "Royal, \{H. D.\} and Brown, \{P. H.\} and Claunch, \{B. C.\}",

year = "1978",

doi = "10.1148/128.1.229",

language = "English",

volume = "128",

pages = "229--234",

journal = "Radiology",

issn = "0033-8419",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobile gamma cameras

T2 - a comparative evaluation

AU - Royal, H. D.

AU - Brown, P. H.

AU - Claunch, B. C.

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - Mobile gamma cameras from three manufacturers were evaluated. Count rate capability, flood uniformity, intrinsic and extrinsic spatial resolution, and sensitivity were compared, using images made under reproducible conditions with phantoms which simulate actual clinical situations.

AB - Mobile gamma cameras from three manufacturers were evaluated. Count rate capability, flood uniformity, intrinsic and extrinsic spatial resolution, and sensitivity were compared, using images made under reproducible conditions with phantoms which simulate actual clinical situations.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0018100621

U2 - 10.1148/128.1.229

DO - 10.1148/128.1.229

M3 - Article

C2 - 663215

AN - SCOPUS:0018100621

SN - 0033-8419

VL - 128

SP - 229

EP - 234

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

IS - 1

ER -

Mobile gamma cameras: a comparative evaluation

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this