TY - JOUR
T1 - Mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter intervention for mitral regurgitation
T2 - surgical techniques, challenges and outcomes
AU - Marin-Cuartas, Mateo
AU - Zaid, Syed
AU - Kempfert, Jörg
AU - Borger, Michael A.
AU - Akansel, Serdar
AU - Noack, Thilo
AU - Holzhey, David
AU - Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
AU - George, Isaac
AU - Ailawadi, Gorav
AU - Smith, Robert L.
AU - Geirrson, Arnar
AU - El-Eshmawi, Ahmed
AU - Pandis, Dimosthenis
AU - de Waha, Suzanne
AU - Bonaros, Nikolaos
AU - Praz, Fabien
AU - Taramasso, Maurizio
AU - De Bonis, Michele
AU - Conradi, Lenard
AU - Hagl, Christian
AU - Doll, Nicolas
AU - Wehbe, Mahmoud
AU - Dashkevich, Alexey
AU - la Cuesta, Manuela de
AU - Kang, Jagdip
AU - Dietze, Zara
AU - Kiefer, Philipp
AU - Tang, Gilbert H.L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: This review article aims to examine the surgical approach to patients with failed mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER), focusing on operative challenges, decision-making and contemporary outcome data. Technical considerations, including device removal and the management of complex mitral valve (MV) anatomy, are discussed. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review and gathered the experience from high-volume centres in the surgical management of failed M-TEER. RESULTS: MV surgery after failed M-TEER is a complex but increasingly necessary procedure as the use of M-TEER grows. It occurs in up to 6% of patients, with a median age of 70–76 years at the moment of failure and a median time to failure of <6 months. MV surgery following M-TEER is associated with high mortality and morbidity, with a reported 30-day mortality ranging from 10% to 40% and 1-year survival below 60%. Functional device failure, structural device failure, MV disease progression and infective endocarditis are frequent mechanisms of M-TEER failure. Surgical MV repair is the preferred management strategy; however, due to the technical and anatomical complexity, MV replacement is performed much more frequently (MV repair rates <10%). CONCLUSIONS: MV surgery after failed M-TEER poses technical challenges due to the presence of altered anatomy, the need for concomitant procedures and the patient’s comorbidities. While surgical intervention carries increased risks, it remains the definitive treatment for failed M-TEER, offering durable relief from MR. Due to the technical complexities associated with these procedures, strong consideration should be given to transferring patients requiring MV surgery after failed M-TEER to high-volume MV centres.
AB - OBJECTIVES: This review article aims to examine the surgical approach to patients with failed mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER), focusing on operative challenges, decision-making and contemporary outcome data. Technical considerations, including device removal and the management of complex mitral valve (MV) anatomy, are discussed. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review and gathered the experience from high-volume centres in the surgical management of failed M-TEER. RESULTS: MV surgery after failed M-TEER is a complex but increasingly necessary procedure as the use of M-TEER grows. It occurs in up to 6% of patients, with a median age of 70–76 years at the moment of failure and a median time to failure of <6 months. MV surgery following M-TEER is associated with high mortality and morbidity, with a reported 30-day mortality ranging from 10% to 40% and 1-year survival below 60%. Functional device failure, structural device failure, MV disease progression and infective endocarditis are frequent mechanisms of M-TEER failure. Surgical MV repair is the preferred management strategy; however, due to the technical and anatomical complexity, MV replacement is performed much more frequently (MV repair rates <10%). CONCLUSIONS: MV surgery after failed M-TEER poses technical challenges due to the presence of altered anatomy, the need for concomitant procedures and the patient’s comorbidities. While surgical intervention carries increased risks, it remains the definitive treatment for failed M-TEER, offering durable relief from MR. Due to the technical complexities associated with these procedures, strong consideration should be given to transferring patients requiring MV surgery after failed M-TEER to high-volume MV centres.
KW - Mitral regurgitation
KW - Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
KW - Mitral valve repair
KW - Mitral valve replacement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008147943
U2 - 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf179
DO - 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf179
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40411760
AN - SCOPUS:105008147943
SN - 1010-7940
VL - 67
JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
IS - 6
M1 - ezaf179
ER -