Mitigating the effects of COVID-19 on HIV treatment and care in Lusaka, Zambia: A before-after cohort study using mixed effects regression

Jake M. Pry, Kombatende Sikombe, Aaloke Mody, Shilpa Iyer, Jacob Mutale, Natalie Vlahakis, Theodora Savory, Mwanza Wa Mwanza, Keith Mweebo, Annie Mwila, Consity Mwale, Mpande Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya, Andrew D. Kerkhoff, Izukanji Sikazwe, Carolyn Bolton Moore, Daniel Mwamba, Elvin H. Geng, Michael E. Herce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction The Zambian Ministry of Health (MoH) issued COVID-19 mitigation guidance for HIV care immediately after the first COVID-19 case was confirmed in Zambia on 18 March 2020. The Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia implemented MoH guidance by: 1) extending antiretroviral therapy (ART) refill duration to 6 multi-month dispensation (6MMD) and 2) task-shifting communication and mobilisation of those in HIV care to collect their next ART refill early. We assessed the impact of COVID-19 mitigation guidance on HIV care 3 months before and after guidance implementation. Methods We reviewed all ART pharmacy visit data in the national HIV medical record for PLHIV in care having ≥1 visit between 1 January - 30 June 2020 at 59 HIV care facilities in Lusaka Province, Zambia. We undertook a before-after evaluation using mixed-effects Poisson regression to examine predictors and marginal probability of early clinic return (pharmacy visit >7 days before next appointment), proportion of late visit (>7 days late for next appointment) and probability of receiving a 6MMD ART refill. Results A total of 101 371 individuals (64% female, median age 39) with 130 486 pharmacy visits were included in the analysis. We observed a significant increase in the adjusted prevalence ratio (4.63; 95% CI 4.45 to 4.82) of early return before compared with after guidance implementation. Receipt of 6MMD increased from a weekly mean of 47.9% (95% CI 46.6% to 49.2%) before to 73.4% (95% CI 72.0% to 74.9%) after guidance implementation. The proportion of late visits (8-89 days late) was significantly higher before (18.8%, 95% CI17.2%to20.2%) compared with after (15.1%, 95% CI13.8%to16.4%) guidance implementation. Conclusions Timely issuance and implementation of COVID-19 mitigation guidance involving task-shifted patient communication and mobilisation alongside 6MMD significantly increased early return to ART clinic, potentially reducing interruptions in HIV care during a global public health emergency.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere007312
JournalBMJ Global Health
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 25 2022

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • HIV
  • cohort study
  • epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mitigating the effects of COVID-19 on HIV treatment and care in Lusaka, Zambia: A before-after cohort study using mixed effects regression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this