TY - JOUR
T1 - Micropublication
T2 - Incentivizing community curation and placing unpublished data into the public domain
AU - Raciti, Daniela
AU - Yook, Karen
AU - Harris, Todd W.
AU - Schedl, Tim
AU - Sternberg, Paul W.
N1 - Funding Information:
At this stage, each new submission informs the evolution of Micropublication, in terms of what the community is willing to submit as well as how well each compartmentalized form for a specific data type functions. For example, an expression pattern easily fits in a semantic expression, however, a result that involves a phenotype observation requires more contextual information that often extends beyond the bounds of current controlled vocabularies. We have demonstrated a proof of principle for submission of C. elegans gene expression data and drug induced phenotype (http://www.micropublicationbiology. org/). The priority of incorporating additional data-types will be community-driven. For example, authors expressed interest in micropublishing results for data types for which we did not have a submission form, such as gene locus mapping data, genetic screen results and variation sequence data. For these and future requests where we do not have a ready submission form, we provide a simple word template that authors can use to submit their data. As we progress with our publication platform, we will continue to prioritize the forms’ design according to the interest of the community. We aim to test whether the Micropublication paradigm can be implemented cost-effectively and adopted broadly by the biological research community. In the longer term, this open science model can be extended to other disciplines. The Micropublication project is supported until 2020 by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. After the development and establishment of our platform we will be able to project what will be our maintenance and expansion costs, allowing us to explore future funding models.
Funding Information:
National Institute of Health (U01-LM012672 to P.W.S. and T.S.) for the Micropublication project. US National Human Genome Research Institute (U41-HG002223 to P.W.S.) for WormBase. Funding for open access charge: National Institute of Health U01-LM012672.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Large volumes of data generated by research laboratories coupled with the required effort and cost of curation present a significant barrier to inclusion of these data in authoritative community databases. Further, many publicly funded experimental observations remain invisible to curation simply because they are never published: results often do not fit within the scope of a standard publication; trainee-generated data are forgotten when the experimenter (e.g. student, post-doc) leaves the lab; results are omitted from science narratives due to publication bias where certain results are considered irrelevant for the publication. While authors are in the best position to curate their own data, they face a steep learning curve to ensure that appropriate referential tags, metadata, and ontologies are applied correctly to their observations, a task sometimes considered beyond the scope of their research and other numerous responsibilities. Getting researchers to adopt a new system of data reporting and curation requires a fundamental change in behavior among all members of the research community. To solve these challenges, we have created a novel scholarly communication platform that captures data from researchers and directly delivers them to information resources via Micropublication. This platform incentivizes authors to publish their unpublished observations along with associated metadata by providing a deliberately fast and lightweight but still peer-reviewed process that results in a citable publication. Our long-term goal is to develop a data ecosystem that improves reproducibility and accountability of publicly funded research and in turn accelerates both basic and translational discovery.
AB - Large volumes of data generated by research laboratories coupled with the required effort and cost of curation present a significant barrier to inclusion of these data in authoritative community databases. Further, many publicly funded experimental observations remain invisible to curation simply because they are never published: results often do not fit within the scope of a standard publication; trainee-generated data are forgotten when the experimenter (e.g. student, post-doc) leaves the lab; results are omitted from science narratives due to publication bias where certain results are considered irrelevant for the publication. While authors are in the best position to curate their own data, they face a steep learning curve to ensure that appropriate referential tags, metadata, and ontologies are applied correctly to their observations, a task sometimes considered beyond the scope of their research and other numerous responsibilities. Getting researchers to adopt a new system of data reporting and curation requires a fundamental change in behavior among all members of the research community. To solve these challenges, we have created a novel scholarly communication platform that captures data from researchers and directly delivers them to information resources via Micropublication. This platform incentivizes authors to publish their unpublished observations along with associated metadata by providing a deliberately fast and lightweight but still peer-reviewed process that results in a citable publication. Our long-term goal is to develop a data ecosystem that improves reproducibility and accountability of publicly funded research and in turn accelerates both basic and translational discovery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054774139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/database/bay013
DO - 10.1093/database/bay013
M3 - Article
C2 - 29688367
AN - SCOPUS:85054774139
SN - 1758-0463
VL - 2018
JO - Database
JF - Database
IS - 2018
ER -