Keyphrases
Meta-analysis
100%
Systematic Meta-analysis
100%
Local Anesthesia
100%
Epidural Anesthesia
100%
Lumbar Discectomy
100%
Microendoscopy
100%
General Anesthesia
63%
Endoscopic Discectomy
45%
Oswestry Disability Index
27%
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score
27%
Reoperation Rate
27%
No Significant Difference
18%
Complication Rate
18%
Short Form 36 (SF-36)
18%
Patient-reported Outcomes
18%
Anesthetic Techniques
18%
Durotomy
18%
Recurrent Disc Herniation
18%
Inclusion Criteria
9%
Risk Reduction
9%
Anesthesia
9%
Surgical Outcomes
9%
Lumbar
9%
Visual Analog Scale
9%
Cost Reduction
9%
Blood Loss
9%
PubMed
9%
Time Loss
9%
Risk of Bias
9%
Embase
9%
Patient Selection
9%
Exclusion Criteria
9%
Overall Complications
9%
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
9%
Scopus
9%
Anesthesia Methods
9%
36-item Short Form
9%
Physical Component Score
9%
Rate Factor
9%
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
9%
Reduced Morbidity
9%
Nerve Root
9%
Surgical Time
9%
Surgical Factors
9%
Pooled Study
9%
Visual Analogue Scale Back Pain (VAS Back)
9%
Visual Analog Scale Leg Pain (VAS leg)
9%
Surgeon-patient Communication
9%
Medicine and Dentistry
Meta-Analysis
100%
Systematic Review
100%
Local Anesthesia
100%
Epidural Anesthesia
100%
Lumbar Discectomy
100%
General Anesthesia
63%
Discectomy
45%
Orthopedics
27%
Reoperation
27%
Patient-Reported Outcome
27%
Oswestry Disability Index
27%
Visual Analog Scale
18%
Short Form 36
18%
Intervertebral Disk Hernia
18%
Health Care Cost
9%
Surgeon
9%
Operation Duration
9%
Nerve Root
9%
Bleeding
9%
Backache
9%
Leg Pain
9%
Patient Communication
9%