TY - JOUR
T1 - Microbial electron uptake in microbial electrosynthesis
T2 - a mini-review
AU - Karthikeyan, Rengasamy
AU - Singh, Rajesh
AU - Bose, Arpita
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the U.S. Department of Energy (Grant number DESC0014613), the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (Grant number 201563111), and the U.S. Department of Defense, Army Research Office (Grant number W911NF-18-1-0037). We would also like to thank Marta Wegorzewska, Washington University in St. Louis, USA for feedback on the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Microbial electron uptake (EU) is the biological capacity of microbes to accept electrons from electroconductive solid materials. EU has been leveraged for sustainable bioproduction strategies via microbial electrosynthesis (MES). MES often involves the reduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon molecules, with electrons derived from electrodes in a bioelectrochemical system. EU can be indirect or direct. Indirect EU-based MES uses electron mediators to transfer electrons to microbes. Although an excellent initial strategy, indirect EU requires higher electrical energy. In contrast, the direct supply of cathodic electrons to microbes (direct EU) is more sustainable and energy efficient. Nonetheless, low product formation due to low electron transfer rates during direct EU remains a major challenge. Compared to indirect EU, direct EU is less well-studied perhaps due to the more recent discovery of this microbial capability. This mini-review focuses on the recent advances and challenges of direct EU in relation to MES.
AB - Microbial electron uptake (EU) is the biological capacity of microbes to accept electrons from electroconductive solid materials. EU has been leveraged for sustainable bioproduction strategies via microbial electrosynthesis (MES). MES often involves the reduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon molecules, with electrons derived from electrodes in a bioelectrochemical system. EU can be indirect or direct. Indirect EU-based MES uses electron mediators to transfer electrons to microbes. Although an excellent initial strategy, indirect EU requires higher electrical energy. In contrast, the direct supply of cathodic electrons to microbes (direct EU) is more sustainable and energy efficient. Nonetheless, low product formation due to low electron transfer rates during direct EU remains a major challenge. Compared to indirect EU, direct EU is less well-studied perhaps due to the more recent discovery of this microbial capability. This mini-review focuses on the recent advances and challenges of direct EU in relation to MES.
KW - Bioelectrochemical system
KW - Direct EU
KW - Indirect EU
KW - Microbial electron uptake
KW - Microbial electrosynthesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064233385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10295-019-02166-6
DO - 10.1007/s10295-019-02166-6
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30923971
AN - SCOPUS:85064233385
SN - 1367-5435
VL - 46
SP - 1419
EP - 1426
JO - Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology
JF - Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology
IS - 9-10
ER -