Microbial co-occurrences on catheters from long-term catheterized patients

Taylor M. Nye, Zongsen Zou, Chloe L.P. Obernuefemann, Jerome S. Pinkner, Erin Lowry, Kent Kleinschmidt, Karla Bergeron, Aleksandra Klim, Karen W. Dodson, Ana L. Flores-Mireles, Jennifer N. Walker, Daniel Garrett Wong, Alana Desai, Michael G. Caparon, Scott J. Hultgren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), a common cause of healthcare-associated infections, are caused by a diverse array of pathogens that are increasingly becoming antibiotic resistant. We analyze the microbial occurrences in catheter and urine samples from 55 human long-term catheterized patients collected over one year. Although most of these patients were prescribed antibiotics over several collection periods, their catheter samples remain colonized by one or more bacterial species. Examination of a total of 366 catheter and urine samples identify 13 positive and 13 negative genus co-occurrences over 12 collection periods, representing associations that occur more or less frequently than expected by chance. We find that for many patients, the microbial species composition between collection periods is similar. In a subset of patients, we find that the most frequently sampled bacteria, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis, co-localize on catheter samples. Further, co-culture of paired isolates recovered from the same patients reveals that E. coli significantly augments E. faecalis growth in an artificial urine medium, where E. faecalis monoculture grows poorly. These findings suggest novel strategies to collapse polymicrobial CAUTI in long-term catheterized patients by targeting mechanisms that promote positive co-associations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number61
JournalNature communications
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2024


Dive into the research topics of 'Microbial co-occurrences on catheters from long-term catheterized patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this