TY - JOUR
T1 - Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with fever of unknown origin
T2 - A comprehensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis
AU - Marra, Alexandre R.
AU - Lopes, Gabriel O.V.
AU - Pardo, Isabele
AU - Hsieh, Mariana Kim
AU - Kobayashi, Takaaki
AU - Marra, Pedro S.
AU - Marschall, Jonas
AU - Pinho, João Renato Rebello
AU - Amgarten, Deyvid Emanuel
AU - de Mello Malta, Fernanda
AU - dos Santos, Nathalia Villa
AU - Edmond, Michael B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) holds promise in diagnosing fever of unknown origin (FUO) by detecting diverse pathogens. We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate mNGS's accuracy, clinical efficacy, and limitations in FUO diagnosis. Nine studies revealed mNGS's positivity rate ranging from 66.7% to 93.5% for bacterial bloodstream infections and systemic infections. Meta-analysis of three studies involving 857 patients, including 354 with FUO, showed a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93) and specificity of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58-0.70). Despite lower specificity, mNGS demonstrated a higher Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR) of 17.0 (95% CI: 4.5-63.4) compared to conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) at 4.7 (95% CI: 2.9-7.6). While mNGS offers high sensitivity but low specificity in identifying causative pathogens for FUO, its superior DOR suggests potential for more accurate diagnoses and targeted interventions. Further research is warranted to optimize its clinical application in FUO management.
AB - Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) holds promise in diagnosing fever of unknown origin (FUO) by detecting diverse pathogens. We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate mNGS's accuracy, clinical efficacy, and limitations in FUO diagnosis. Nine studies revealed mNGS's positivity rate ranging from 66.7% to 93.5% for bacterial bloodstream infections and systemic infections. Meta-analysis of three studies involving 857 patients, including 354 with FUO, showed a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93) and specificity of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58-0.70). Despite lower specificity, mNGS demonstrated a higher Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR) of 17.0 (95% CI: 4.5-63.4) compared to conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) at 4.7 (95% CI: 2.9-7.6). While mNGS offers high sensitivity but low specificity in identifying causative pathogens for FUO, its superior DOR suggests potential for more accurate diagnoses and targeted interventions. Further research is warranted to optimize its clinical application in FUO management.
KW - Diagnostic methods
KW - Fever of unknown origin
KW - Metagenomic NGS
KW - Systematic literature review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199452677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116465
DO - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116465
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39059148
AN - SCOPUS:85199452677
SN - 0732-8893
VL - 110
JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
IS - 2
M1 - 116465
ER -